2013-01-12

Let us sing of covers

.

Now that Byuck is available on paper, it's time to discuss its cover, work of the inestimable Matt Page.

The first thing you should know about Matt is that the man is a workhorse. He can generate ideas and polish them and throw them out in less time than your average designer can figure out how to turn on the espresso machine. I highly recommend him.

This post will be more narrative than salespitch, and as such we must go way back in time to 1999, when Byuck was just a few scenes from a barely-begun play---and I created my first image. I'm not going to look through boxes for a copy of this anthropormorphized Y with a B and an eye on one side and an UCK and an eye on the other side. Suffice it to say it was ugly. I was pleased with it though and showed it to this designer girl I knew who promptly vomited. Somehow she blocked it out and we married, with the side effect that I developed some taste. Lucky.

When [Publisher X] was on the cusp of publishing Byuck in 2007, I was mocking up covers and marketing plans for them. I was pleased with my designs from an aesthetic standpoint, but they failed to make any comedic statements and so were ultimately deadends.

Here's my favorite idea from the time, remade in Paint to negate any awesomeness.


Maybe throw a lacrosse stick against the fence, and voila!

But I'm sure you can see the issues here.

(Mountains' source.)

Picket fences are a controlling image from the book, but they don't really SAY much on their own. Or, rather, what such fences generally mean doesn't apply here. So it's a bust.

My other idea I couldn't draw to save my life: a ballpoint pen, a keyboard, and a lacrosse stick crossed like the swords behind a coat of arms.

Anyway, the whole publication fell through so I put those ideas to rest.

Fastforward almost five years to Strange Violin contacting me and, ultimately, to Matt Page being sent the manuscript.

Matt and I already had some history. He had refused to be part of the Sunstone comics issue no matter how I cajoled. He later regretted that which is part of why he did so much awesome work on Monsters & Mormons. Then add the incredible cover he did for Strange Violin's A Short Stay in Hell and I decided not to give him any suggestions and just see what he would come up with. Which resulted in this:


Which, even though there's nothing wrong with it, I didn't like? Why not?

Two main reasons. First, it looks too YA. But more importantly, due to philosophical/aesthetic reasons, Byuck's main characters are underdescribed. Dave and Ref only look like this to Matt. With the exception of what Ref's wearing, none of this is in the text.


I'm aiming for universality. So I underdescribe main characters as a matter of aesthetic necessity. Readers will fill in the blanks from two dots and a line.

And I don't want them beholden to what the cover says they look like.

You can tell I feel strongly about this.

Anyway, I mentioned the picket fence idea and Matt came up with this:


Mountains in the background was just one of the ideas I'd fittered with for the picket fence idea; Matt chose to add them on his own.

I never quite figured out what I didn't like about this cover---probably because I liked many thing about it---and Matt tried multiple other variations: more text, boxes, different fonts, etc. Here are a couple favorites:


At which point the publisher and I selected our favorite (basically the brown version of that last one) and we were ready to go to press.

Which is when Matt threw the entire concept out. Why? Because, he said, it was too suggestive of pioneer themes.

That's it! That's the problem! Mt Timp is utterly irrelevant to the story at hand! I mean, sure, at one point a couple characters go up Provo Canyon, but in general, no. Irrelevant. Misleading. It's not that kind of Mormon book.

Plus, what's funny about this? And Matt's a funny guy.

Most impressively, Matt came upon this insight when his brain was so fried
You know how sometimes you look at a word for too long it seems absurd and doesn't even look like a real word? Well this is the first time that has happened where I am actually right that it isn't a real word.
We had a long gchat and I shared some of my ideas. Before he came back with some takes on those though, he tried to sell us once more on faces.


But I wasn't budging though this cover I am actually quite fond of.

Finally we reached the conclusive set of options:


All of these were good. We ended up choosing the teal (albeit with a white border which worked better with the spine) though it's always hard for me not to choose orange when it's an option. But we were out of time and I was told I had used up my persnickety allowance.

I began broadcasting the image at this point (sometimes, I admit, the orange one) and it immediately started getting compliments. My favorite from Stephen Carter who said it looked like something out of McSweeney's catalogue. Which I take as high praise indeed. They're the best in the business, no question.

Before you look at the full cover, I'm constrained to point out the photo was not my idea. The publisher found it. Somewhere.

Be careful what you put on the intervebz, kids.


I think that covers the story of the cover.

In the end, we got something great.

With handcrafted type.

That says funny.

What more could a boy ask for?

Next time, I'll tell stories of that "advance praise" you can't quite read..

2013-01-11

Lost Songs: “Love Is All Around” by Wet Wet Wet

.

When I started Lost Songs, I thought what would happen is I would catch myself singing a song I hadn't heard in at least three years then pause and write about it. What I didn't expect is that I would catch myself singing a song that hadn't even shown up on my internal jukebox in that long.

But that happened yesterday. I came out of the bathroom to an external hallway, my fingers slightly damp from being washed, and I heard a girl complain about how cold it was. And it was cold. The passing wind had latched onto my fingers. And I suddenly started singing:
I feel it in my fingers
I feel it in my toes
Which to me will always be the Wet Wet Wet version first. I really dug this song when it came out. (Before you judge, remember: The whole world did.) I'm pretty sure I bought the album on tape, even, just before my mission.

I know, right?

2013-01-09

Lost Songs: "Everybody Plays the Fool" by Aaron Neville

.

This is one of the songs from my teen years that had the right mix of sentimentality and earnestness and fun that kept me up listening to my clock radio hoping it would suddenly appear. I'm not ashamed. I still think it's a great song. And I don't think I can overstate how much I liked it its first couple years on the radio.

The funny thing is, in my imagination, Aaron Neville had always been a betuxed scrawny white guy. A cross between Harry Connick Jr and old Sinatra caricatures. So the first time I saw him---a ripped black guy in torn denim and pencil stache---that was a funny feeling. And I think it taught me something, though I don't want to read too much into the experience.

All that said, I still think that Aaron Neville is the king of the falsettos. Yes, yes, Frankie Valli and Barry Gibb can have honorable mentions, but as far as enjoyable to listen to (rather than just fun to sing along with), Mr Neville wins that race.

C'mon. You know you love him.

Maybe not this video, though.

2013-01-08

How to get over it. . . .

.

I recently bumped up again against a Fob Bible review by Dallas Robbins that includes this paragraph:
“How to Get Over It, a public service message” is a running series throughout the book in which familiar tales are recounted with deadpan delivery. One is “The Joseph Method,” which begins, “Joseph, who later would use the stage name ‘Joseph of Egypt’ (and, much, much later, ‘Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat’), was sold into slavery by his brothers—to a bunch of hairy Ishmaelites no less” (65). It reminds one more of the “Shouts and Murmurs” section of the New Yorker, than of any sort of biblical fiction one might find at Deseret Book.
In case you don't know, these public-service messages' original provenance was Byuck.

Which you can buy.

And probably should.



2013-01-06

Byuck now in paperback!

.

Sorry to interrupt your regulaly scheduled sabbath, but somehow Barnes and Noble has jumped the gun and has the book on paper before anyone else.

And?

And they're selling it at the unexpectedly low price of $7.97.

That won't last. I guarantee it.

Dally not.

2013-01-03

Too few cooks preventing the broth

.

A few months ago, James Goldberg took apart a play by Mahonri Stewart. (It's not the only thing he dismantled, but unlike the other authors, Mahonri is the only one currenly active in the cultural corners of the Bloggernacle.) Chaos erupted. But whether you're one of Mahonri's agitprops or a conscientious objector to Mahonri's work (we've many in both camps, of course), James's main argument strikes me as undeniable.
. . . I don’t think most of us want Mormon Literature to be a playground game. I think we want to take craft seriously and take our role in society seriously---and that means we have to acknowledge that there are about a million things that can go wrong aesthetically or ethically with a piece. So unless Mormon writers are gods, there ought to be at least a few things in every story that we can and should call out and comment on.
For how else shall we grow?

I review a lot of Mormon art (this tag is not yet fully populated) (not all of these are reviews) and I've pulled punches then been lambasted for being mean and taken off the gloves and been ignored and offered plain criticisms and been thanked. I do not, however, think I've consistently met James's goal to be one of the "others . . . willing to call out . . . work in equal plainness." I haven't often been as specific as James in my diagnosis, so how useful is what I say?

And, as we saw from his post, not everyone really takes to that sort of precise criticism.

Which is a shame, because I think that's what we need more of.

Now let's move to Byuck as a plot point. Granted, it hasn't been available a month yet and the print edition has been delayed and the hardback's been cancelled and, granted, I'm a truly lousy marketer (esoteric to a fault!) so I have no room to start complaining about the paucity of reviews. And I'm not. I'm looking forward, not around.

Some points. First, who knows if anyone will ever read and review Byuck? Second, if they do, are they more likely to be one of those who love the book or one of those who find it offensive to all that is good and pure in life---and either/or, will the be usefully critical? Third, how worthy of attention is it anyway? I'm hardly the best judge of that. Fourth, would such a criticism be useful only to me or to us generally?

But I think the real issue (and we saw this in James's post) is that, as I am well ensconced among those most likely to write about the book, who can say who will be willing to say what, knowing I will hear?

This is a nonspecific-to-Byuck question I open to all.

Are we getting a little too inbred in MoLit? Do we have sufficient genetic diversity? Is there enough violence to ensure evolution?

I want you to tell me.

2013-01-02

The final books of 2012

.


Holy smokes! The year is over! Caught me off guard so I'm publishing this a few days late.

082) Sing We Now of Christmas by Michael Young, finished December 29

Lady Steed noted that I was sighing a lot when I started reading this collection of Christmas tales. And she's right. I was. But as I read on, the overexplanations and overthetop cheesinesses of the book mattered less and I was able to just enjoy the purity of intent. A Christmas miracle!

The stories vary a lot in terms of skill, but that's not surprising since several included authors have published multiple novels and several included authors count this as their first publication. And sometimes the quality was confusing. One of my favorite stories was Ryan Larsen's take on the Wenceslas legend, but at the same time, its frame story was confused and inconsistent.

The book's proceeds go to charity so I don't want to be unkind. In short, I enjoyed the book very much. And I mostly kept to it's advent nature of a story-a-day (though I didn't get the final tale read until well after Christmas thanks to family and travel). I think it's a great way to structure a Christmas anthology and you should consider it for your own befrosted heart. Or contributing to the next edition. (I happen to know that slots are filling fast.)
about the length of time it was supposed to



===========================================================



081) What now, McBride? by Gary Lee Davis, finished December 27

About ten years ago I found a copy of this novella at the DI. With its crazy cover and protagonist named Nephi and conversion/romance story, it seemed such a snapshot of Mormon lit in 1982---or at least it backed up my assumptions---and I've always regretted not buying it.

We drove to my parents for the days after Christmas, where my dad presented me with the copy you see scanned here. He was excited by this find---a discard from the ward library---and wanted me to read it. It was cheesy and silly (in the second sense) but only 99 pages so I should totally share his experience.

So I did.

You can read more about it on A Motley Vision.

two days



===========================================================



080) Sailor Twain by Mark Siegel, finished December 20


I did not anticipated the epic length of this book when I ordered it from the library.


You can click the image to read the first few chapters.

The advance praise from a healthy variety of luminaries made me hope for something I had been looking for.

Most of the great comix novels of the past decade have shared certain similarities. Jimmy Corrigan, American Born Chinese, Asterios Polyp, Blankets, Habibi, Duncan the Wonder Dog---all truly excellent books.

But they're all engaged in similar postmodern plays against time and narrative. So my first hope when I saw Sailor Twain's girth was that it would be a truly great novel in the traditional, storybound sense.

And I though it would be for most of the book.

Sailor Twain is truly epic and beautifully drawn. It drips with symbolic moments, but sometimes those moments drip off the side of the boat and I can't quite tell where they're headed. Take the matryoshka dolls, for instance. Great idea. Not quite sure where it's headed. And if Lafeyette's last love is his true love, then . . . what about the other six? And if that love is greater than all the others, then what the heck?

See, one of the primary themes under consideration in Sailor Twain is fidelity. Twain loves his wife, with whom he has a longstanding love, but is gradually seduced by the mermaid. And the novel can't decide whether that is tragic or awesome. But not in a pleasantly ambiguous way. In a confused sort of way.

Similarly, Lafeyette's been substituting sex for love but then love appears instantaneously? Isn't that the opposite of what we're getting (or not getting from Twain?).

One argument to make here is that Sailor Twain demands multiple readings to release its secrets. That may well be.

I'm satisfied waiting for Siegel's next book and seeing if he's figured out what he's trying to say.

All that said, I much of the novel and much of the story. In fact, it wasn't until the advent of deeper magic (which you think would be find in a story about mermaids fer gosh sake) and the plummeting collisions that constituted climax and finale and denouement and epilogue that I lost my way. A shame.

I really thought I was going to be pushing this book into your hands.
three or four days



Previously in 2012 . . . . :


Read the reviews of 71-74.
079) Nursery Rhyme Comics edited by Chris Duffy, finished December 14
078) The Truth about Fiction by Steven Schoen, finished December 11
077) Hereville: How Mirka Got Her Sword by Barry Deutsch, finished December 3
076) Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl, finished December 2
075) Spawn: New Flesh by David Hine and Brian Haberlin, finished November 29


Read the reviews of 71-74.
074) Level Up by Gene Luen Yang and Thien Pham, finished November 23
073) The Adventures of Mr. Obadiah Oldbuck by Rodolphe Töpffer, finished November 21
072) The Eternal Smile by Gene Luen Yang and Derek Kirk Kim finished probably November 21
071) The Clouds Above by Jordon Crane, finished probably November 19


Read the review of 70.
070) Byuck by Theric Jepson, finished November 17

Read the review of 68-69.
069) Pork Pie Hat by Peter Straub, finished November 16
068) Off Season ("The Author's Uncut, Uncensored Version!") by Jack Ketchum, finished November 14


Read the review of 67.
067) Up the Down Staircase by Bel Kaufman, finished November 6

Read the reviews of 61-66.
066) Nurse Nurse by Katie Skelly, finished November 3
065) Best American Comics 2012 edited by Françoise Mouly, finished November 3
064) Everything We Miss by Luke Pearson, finished November 1
063) Amulet: Prince of the Elves by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 30
062) Amulet: The Last Council by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 25
061) iPlates: Volume One by Stephen Carter and Jett Atwood, finished October 22


Read the reviews of 57-61.
061) Amulet: The Cloud Searchers by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 14
060) Amulet: The Stonekeeper's Curse by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 13
059) Amulet: The Stonekeeper by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 10
058) Feedback by Robison Wells, finished October 9
057) Mormons in the Media, 1830-2012 by Jared Farmer, finished October 8


Read the review of 56.
056) The Garden of the World by Lawrence Coates, finished October 5

Read the reviews of 52-55.
055) The Skin I'm In by Sharon G. Flake, finished September 27
054) Lote That Dog by Sharon Creech, finished September 25
053) Hate That Cat by Sharon Creech, finished September 24
052) Wormwood, Gentleman Corpse: It Only Hurts When I Pee by Ben Templesmith, finished September 24


Read the reviews of 49-51.
051) The Zabîme Sisters by Aristophane, finished September 20
050) Little Death by Thomas Kriebaum, finished September 16
049) God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater by Kurt Vonnegut, finished September 11


Read the reviews of 44-48.
048) American Nerd: The Story of My People by Benjamin Nugent, finished September 7
047) Powers by Brian Michael Bendis and Michael Avon Oeming, finished September 6
046) Simply Science by a number of authors and illustrators for All Aboard Reading, finished September 5
045) Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex by Mary Roach, finished September 3
044) The Strange Case of the Walking Corpse: A Chronicle of Medical Mysteries, Curious Remedies, and Bizarre but True Healing Folklore by Nancy Butcher, finished August 27


Read the reviews of 40-43.
043) How to Analyze the Works of Stephenie Meyer by Marcela Kostihova, finished August 13
042) The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie, finished August 10
041) Captain America: Man Out of Time by Mark Waid and Jorge Molina, finished August 1
040) If You Believe in Mermaids . . . Don't Tell by A.A. Philips, finished July 28


Read the reviews of 37-39.
039) The Smartest Man in Ireland by Mollie Hunter, finished July 27
038) Blockade Billy / Morality by Stephen King, finished July 12
037) Dispirited by Luisa M. Perkins, finished July 9


Read the reviews of 34-36.
036) Hyperion by Dan Simmons, finished July 2
035) A Short Stay in Hell by Steven L. Peck, finished June 27
034) Kampung Boy by Lat, finished June 22


Read the reviews of 29-33.
034) The Giant Joshua by Maurine Whipple, finished June 20
033) Fantastic Mr Fox by Roald Dahl, finished June 18
032) Wicked Plants by Amy Stewart, "finished" June 18
031) Make the Bread, Buy the Butter by Jennifer Reese, "finished" June 15
030) The Yiddish Policemen's Union by Michael Chabon, finished June 9
029) Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War by Nathaniel Philbrick, finished early June


Read the reviews of 25-28.
028) Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky, finished May 24
027) The Lover’s Dictionary by David Levithan, finished May 16
026) The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows, finished May 10
025) Dominant Traits by Eric Freeze, finished April 10


Read the reviews of 21-24.
024) The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr., and E.B. White, finished April 2
023) UNTITLED MS by Kyle Jepson, finished March 12, 2012
022) The Complete Peanuts 1981-1982 by Charles M. Schulz, finished March 4
021) The True Meaning of Smekday by Adam Rex, finished March 3


Read the reviews of 14-20.
020) Billy Hazelnuts by Tony Millionaire, finished February 25
019) Good-bye, Chunky Rice by Craig Thompson, finished February 26
018) Madman 20th Anniversary Monster HC by [everybody], finished February 25
017) Billy Hazelnuts and Crazy Bird by Tony Millionaire, finished February 25
016) Billy Hazelnuts by Tony Millionaire, finished February 25
015) Habibi by Craig Thompson, finished February 20
014) The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: 1910 by Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neill, finished February 15


Read the reviews of 12-13.
013) Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell, finished February 12
012) Black Hole by Charles Burns, finished February 11


Read the reviews of 6-11.
011) The Complete Peanuts: 1979-1980 by Charles M. Schulz, finished February 4
010) Blankets by Craig Thompson, finished February 4
009) Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut, finished February 2
008) The Millstone Necklace (forthcoming) by S.P. Bailey, finished January 31
007) American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang, finished January 27
006) Across a Harvested Field by Robert Goble, finished January 23


Read the reviews of 1-5.
005) Hark! a Vagrant! by Kate Beaton, finished January 21
004) The Death of a Disco Dancer by David Clark, finished January 12
003) Bucketfoot Al: The Baseball Life of Al Simmons by Clifton Blue Parker, finished January 9
002) Uncle Montague's Tales of Terror by Chris Priestly, finished January 9
001) What of the Night? by Stephen Carter, finished January 5

2012-12-29

Trying to nail down silly

.

My parents use the word silly to describe literature and film. Best I can tell it has two meanings:

1. Of indeterminate quality but inoffensive and thus enjoyable.

2. Of embarrassingly low quality but inoffensive and thus can be consumed without shame.

Generally (but not always?) silly works contain an element of romance.

2012-12-17

75-79, including a surefire Christmas gift for just about anyone

.

079) Nursery Rhyme Comics edited by Chris Duffy, finished December 14

This is it, folks! This is the Christmas gift you've been looking for! With nursey rhymes comicsized from every one from Mike Mignola to Roz Chast to Stan Sakai to Tony Millionaire to the Los Bros Hernandez to Kate Beaton to Craig Thompson to Gene Luen Yang---I could on. Everyone's in here. I keep going back and adding people. But let's add Jules Feiffer and call it good.

Suffice it to say, the book is even better than you're willing to hope. When you get this many of the best, they show you just what comics can do.

Seriously. If you have a family you need to get a gift for and have no idea, your search is over. Buy this book.
one evening



===========================================================



078) The Truth about Fiction by Steven Schoen, finished December 11

When I read this book as part of a college class a long, long time ago, I was impressed by its simple, direct (and good) advice for writing fiction. Rereading it now, I feel the same. The difference is that thoughts that were revolutionary then, are now so incorporated into my basic functioning that I either can't imagine not knowing them or am actively discovering how to break them.

Shame it's out of print. Prentice Hall should have Schoen rewrite the out-of-date appendices (try the "Internet" for research!) and put it back out. A great teeny introduction to the writing craft.
perhaps a couple months



===========================================================



077) Hereville: How Mirka Got Her Sword by Barry Deutsch, finished December 3

Subtitled "Yet Another Troll-Fighting 11-Year-Old Orthodox Jewish Girl", which should be enough to tell you whether or not you are interested. And if you're not interested, why the heck not?

The book's imperfect (the way it chooses which words to incorporate into the text is inconsistent, for instance), but it's fun and I enjoyed it. Book one is really just chapter one so you may want to go out and get the second book along with the first. I hear the third will incorporate magic fish. And why not magic fish?

The thing I'm newly convinced of, however, is that you shouldn't wait. Start reading them now.

one day



===========================================================



076) Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl, finished December 2

The Big O loved this and so Large S wanted to hear it as well. Dahl, of course, is a blast to read. As a kid I thought this book was much weaker than the sequel, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator. I guess I'll find out. They were so sad it ended I admitted Elevator's existence instead of opening up The Hobbit.
some weeks



===========================================================



075) Spawn: New Flesh by David Hine and Brian Haberlin, finished November 29


About what I always imagined Spawn would be. Demons and violence and grossouts and grand attempts at depth. Nothing here folks, move along.
about half an hour




Previously in 2012 . . . . :


Read the reviews of 71-74.
074) Level Up by Gene Luen Yang and Thien Pham, finished November 23
073) The Adventures of Mr. Obadiah Oldbuck by Rodolphe Töpffer, finished November 21
072) The Eternal Smile by Gene Luen Yang and Derek Kirk Kim finished probably November 21
071) The Clouds Above by Jordon Crane, finished probably November 19


Read the review of 70.
070) Byuck by Theric Jepson, finished November 17

Read the review of 68-69.
069) Pork Pie Hat by Peter Straub, finished November 16
068) Off Season ("The Author's Uncut, Uncensored Version!") by Jack Ketchum, finished November 14


Read the review of 67.
067) Up the Down Staircase by Bel Kaufman, finished November 6

Read the reviews of 61-66.
066) Nurse Nurse by Katie Skelly, finished November 3
065) Best American Comics 2012 edited by Françoise Mouly, finished November 3
064) Everything We Miss by Luke Pearson, finished November 1
063) Amulet: Prince of the Elves by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 30
062) Amulet: The Last Council by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 25
061) iPlates: Volume One by Stephen Carter and Jett Atwood, finished October 22


Read the reviews of 57-61.
061) Amulet: The Cloud Searchers by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 14
060) Amulet: The Stonekeeper's Curse by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 13
059) Amulet: The Stonekeeper by Kazu Kibuishi, finished October 10
058) Feedback by Robison Wells, finished October 9
057) Mormons in the Media, 1830-2012 by Jared Farmer, finished October 8


Read the review of 56.
056) The Garden of the World by Lawrence Coates, finished October 5

Read the reviews of 52-55.
055) The Skin I'm In by Sharon G. Flake, finished September 27
054) Lote That Dog by Sharon Creech, finished September 25
053) Hate That Cat by Sharon Creech, finished September 24
052) Wormwood, Gentleman Corpse: It Only Hurts When I Pee by Ben Templesmith, finished September 24


Read the reviews of 49-51.
051) The Zabîme Sisters by Aristophane, finished September 20
050) Little Death by Thomas Kriebaum, finished September 16
049) God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater by Kurt Vonnegut, finished September 11


Read the reviews of 44-48.
048) American Nerd: The Story of My People by Benjamin Nugent, finished September 7
047) Powers by Brian Michael Bendis and Michael Avon Oeming, finished September 6
046) Simply Science by a number of authors and illustrators for All Aboard Reading, finished September 5
045) Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex by Mary Roach, finished September 3
044) The Strange Case of the Walking Corpse: A Chronicle of Medical Mysteries, Curious Remedies, and Bizarre but True Healing Folklore by Nancy Butcher, finished August 27


Read the reviews of 40-43.
043) How to Analyze the Works of Stephenie Meyer by Marcela Kostihova, finished August 13
042) The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie, finished August 10
041) Captain America: Man Out of Time by Mark Waid and Jorge Molina, finished August 1
040) If You Believe in Mermaids . . . Don't Tell by A.A. Philips, finished July 28


Read the reviews of 37-39.
039) The Smartest Man in Ireland by Mollie Hunter, finished July 27
038) Blockade Billy / Morality by Stephen King, finished July 12
037) Dispirited by Luisa M. Perkins, finished July 9


Read the reviews of 34-36.
036) Hyperion by Dan Simmons, finished July 2
035) A Short Stay in Hell by Steven L. Peck, finished June 27
034) Kampung Boy by Lat, finished June 22


Read the reviews of 29-33.
034) The Giant Joshua by Maurine Whipple, finished June 20
033) Fantastic Mr Fox by Roald Dahl, finished June 18
032) Wicked Plants by Amy Stewart, "finished" June 18
031) Make the Bread, Buy the Butter by Jennifer Reese, "finished" June 15
030) The Yiddish Policemen's Union by Michael Chabon, finished June 9
029) Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War by Nathaniel Philbrick, finished early June


Read the reviews of 25-28.
028) Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky, finished May 24
027) The Lover’s Dictionary by David Levithan, finished May 16
026) The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows, finished May 10
025) Dominant Traits by Eric Freeze, finished April 10


Read the reviews of 21-24.
024) The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr., and E.B. White, finished April 2
023) UNTITLED MS by Kyle Jepson, finished March 12, 2012
022) The Complete Peanuts 1981-1982 by Charles M. Schulz, finished March 4
021) The True Meaning of Smekday by Adam Rex, finished March 3


Read the reviews of 14-20.
020) Billy Hazelnuts by Tony Millionaire, finished February 25
019) Good-bye, Chunky Rice by Craig Thompson, finished February 26
018) Madman 20th Anniversary Monster HC by [everybody], finished February 25
017) Billy Hazelnuts and Crazy Bird by Tony Millionaire, finished February 25
016) Billy Hazelnuts by Tony Millionaire, finished February 25
015) Habibi by Craig Thompson, finished February 20
014) The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: 1910 by Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neill, finished February 15


Read the reviews of 12-13.
013) Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell, finished February 12
012) Black Hole by Charles Burns, finished February 11


Read the reviews of 6-11.
011) The Complete Peanuts: 1979-1980 by Charles M. Schulz, finished February 4
010) Blankets by Craig Thompson, finished February 4
009) Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut, finished February 2
008) The Millstone Necklace (forthcoming) by S.P. Bailey, finished January 31
007) American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang, finished January 27
006) Across a Harvested Field by Robert Goble, finished January 23


Read the reviews of 1-5.
005) Hark! a Vagrant! by Kate Beaton, finished January 21
004) The Death of a Disco Dancer by David Clark, finished January 12
003) Bucketfoot Al: The Baseball Life of Al Simmons by Clifton Blue Parker, finished January 9
002) Uncle Montague's Tales of Terror by Chris Priestly, finished January 9
001) What of the Night? by Stephen Carter, finished January 5

2012-12-16

Pants svithe

.

First, if you don't immediately grasp the meaning of pants today, please do not read the rest of this post. You're happier remaining ignorant (I'm not including any links) and I'll be addressing an audience already vested in the question of what color tie I wore today.

Now that the pants-ignorant (and thus blissful) have left, so's you know, I did wear a purple tie today.

When I first became aware of the Wear Pants to Church people I thought it was silly, poorly described, unnecessarily antagonistically presented, silly, etc etc etc; I rolled my eyes, and proceeded to forget about it, stupidly assuming the rest of the world would do the same.

The rest of the world would not do the same.

Next I was aware, the Pants people had turned into a bevy of shameless media-grubbers, and I went back to the Facebook page, hit DECLINE, and said as much.

To be clear, I am completely in favor of the group's intentions, but I thought the execution was awful and the courting of media frenzy tasteless.

Last night however, I reconsidered my position. Not because I felt any differently about the event, but because of the hater trolls that had come out in force. An army of fools and dopes and crueltymongers had come out to attack the Pants people. And as poorly as they had made their attempt to effect awareness, I never thought they were demons in pantsuits.

No one aware of both me and Pants Day can doubt that I would be aware of the latter.

And so today, in solidarity with the pantsers, I wore a purple tie.

I would rather be intentionally associated with a bunch of media-hungry but good-intentioned social hacks, then mistakenly associated with the hoard of antichristian haters that rose up to attack them.

So yes. Purple I was.

And seriously: Wear pants. As a symbol, it ain't bad.

previous svithe

2012-12-14

First in a series? I mean—I certainly have the material . . . .

.

So I spend a lot of time talking about comics (to be meta, yesterday I talked about me talking about comics). But I don't often publish actual comics of my own making. In fact, mostly never. I made a four-page comics version of my Mike Allred interview for the Sunstone comics issue, but my boss deemed it too confusing to the uninitiated, so we just wrote an article instead.

That comic, however, prepared me to create "Mormons by the Bay."

(Not that I haven't used the newscaster idea before. In fact, I use it all the time. See here and here for examples.)

When I saw SF Weekly's call for comics as it prepared its Very First Comics Issue! (theme: Connected in San Francisco), I knew I was going to submit. And since I'm already working on a novel that takes place (partly) in an alternate version of San Francisco where the Mormons never left, I thought I would incorporate some of those elements into the comic.

I intended to fit myself into the smallest space offered to maximize the chances of being accepted and spent a week or two sketching ideas. Then I finally sat down and thumbnailed it, only to discover that, pared down, the comic was still running twice as long as intended. Then I checked the specs and realized that my "as intended" was twice as long as the actual space I was intending to fill.

Time for major edits.

So I scraped it down and got it in and now! what do you know! I'm in.

And I'll tell you what: Crushing my ideas into that small space forced me to prioritize punchline over list-of-facts, which I think was better for everyone.


I stopped by the newsstand on my way to work, but it only had the East Bay Express and the San Francisco Guardian, so I'm still not sure whether or not I'm in print or online only, but still. I published a comic. I'm pretty happy. And if it is in print, I'm getting paid.

The weird thing is realizing that by this time next week, "Mormons by the Bay" may well be the most read thing I've ever published.

I mean---SFW has a circulation of 50,000. Which I'm pretty sure is more than Irreantum.

2012-12-13

Thmusings of Our Shared Past: "All Work and No Play"

.

Because I want to reference this in a post planned for tomorrow and because the original was written before the current blog design and is one of the posts that didn't transfer over well and because fixing them all will be hugely time consuming and because I'm rather fond of this post, I'm reposting it. I think I may throw these images up on Thumblr. as well. . . .

Of course what I should really do it find the original scans and take them into Photoshop and fix them up. Or, even better, find the original images and rescan them. But I'm afraid none of that will be happening.



.

All Work and No Play


.

It's a little known fact that in my spare time I do some freelance magazine illustration. Dr. M. A. Malien is starting a breastfeeding column for one of those ubiquitous new-parent magazines and I was offered the job of illustration. Then they decided to go with well lit but generic photographs of pretty babies with pretty mommies lounging on brightly colored furniture and I got was a kill fee in the mail.

Anyway, I had already done all the work on the first three months' columns, and while I lack the medical school credentials, perhaps if you, like Lady Steed, are a nursing mother known to complain that your “b**bs” hurt, maybe there will be something in it for you.

Dr. Malien's main thesis, however, I have already given the observant. Did you catch it?

(roll over for captions)


Dr. M. A. Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A. Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A. Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A. Malien

Dr. M.A. Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A. Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M.A.Malien

Dr. M. A. Malien







sources of scrap

the George Booth illustrations
the album cover
all other images


In memoriam: Preston McConkie

.

I don't know what I can add to David's post, but I would be amiss not to note the sudden passing of a loyal friend.

The timing makes it feel particularly . . . strange. Preston was an influential force on Byuck and his death arrives between seeing it appear for sale and holding a copy of his own in his hands. It feels so unfair that I don't get to share this moment with him.

Which is a bit petty of me, I know, but still. I owed him that much.

The most significant example of what Preston did for the novel is its final chapter. The original final chapter I'll make available at some point, but the much better version you get when you buy the book only exists because Preston forced me to write it. I was extremely hesitant, but now that five years have passed, I can go back and compare the two versions and he was unquestionably right. Moving the conclusion forward twelve hours? The best byucky advice anyones ever given me.

So while I'm unsettled that a friend only seven years my senior has died---

So while I'm saddened to know that his cheerful madness is gone from my life---

So while I'll miss him and mourn with his family---

Today, selfishly, I'm sad I can't send him a copy of my novel and thank him again and say see what thou hath wrought, Preston?

Adios.

2012-12-12

Danger! Byuck ahead!

.

The long and tortured path Byuck took to publication is over and I don't really want to go over the details. Let some graduate student from the year 2215 work it out. But I do want to consider some of the lessons I should learn.

I'm considering the what-should-I-learn question because I just read a couple articles that suggest I may be some sort of genius.

I choose to be skeptical of this conclusion. I mean---people keep telling Jonathan Safran Foer he's a genius and look what's happened. Talk about your cautionary tales.

So let's set my genius aside for a second and look outside Byuck for evidence.

(Not that eschewing the genius label much minimizes the navelgazing nature of this post, but I work out what I think by writing about it. And I then I throw it like spaghetti, onto this blog's wall to see if it sticks. And you, dear reader, are the only one who suffers.)

First, a couple things that both make me feel cocky and panicked simultaneously.

From Scott Parkin:
It seems to me that we are in the midst of a rather startling expansion of our traditional concepts of Mormon literature. As I’ve been reading Monsters & Mormons off and on over the last two months, and some of James Goldberg’s and Theric Jeppson’s short fiction over the past month I’m struck with how very different some of that work is from the traditional canon and assumptions I’ve had about Mo-lit over the last twenty years.
Obviously, being mentioned alongside James is always a thrill, and, given how much energy I put into Mormon writing, it's nice to hear I might be "making" some sort of "difference."

Second, a paraphrase of something I heard secondhand. Originally spoken by a writer I respect immensely but who doesn't know I know she said it. So we'll leave it unsourced.
Theric's a great writer, but he'll never be mainstream.
Although this was said about my work in general, I wouldn't worry had the immediate impetus been a reading of, say, Pargruffa. But it was said in response to a short story from which I had made a serious effort to excise any lingering weirdness.

Hmm.

Which brings us to Byuck as a test case.

As Diehard Thans know, Byuck has passed through three serious edits. Once with the to-date finest writing group I've known. Once, over about a year, with a publisher that then abruptly decided it was making a terrible mistake. And now with Strange Violin Editions, which edit is something of a hybrid of the first two. In addition, another publisher had me spend a year talking to women who [ a) were not related to me and b) did not owe me money ] into reviewing the book pro bono. Plus there were a couple other publishers that accepted it then rejected it . . . . Anyway. We're not talking about all that.

My point is this: a goodly number of people have read this novel over the years and I've had a lot of feedback. So, yes, Byuck is weird, but, yes, Byuck is accessible. I don't know what "mainstream" means, but I don't think Byuck is assuredly NOT that.

Then again.

I know one woman who was so offended she forbade her 18-year-old son from reading it.

I know one woman who still maintains a public crush on one of the novel's leads.

I know one woman, a U of U alumna, who thought it was BYU propaganda and hated it as such.

I know one woman who knew nothing about Mormons before reading it and finished the book thinking we're a-ok.

(Also men have read the book. Promise.)

Both blurbs that will appear on the softcover are from women I didn't know well at the time they read Byuck but who requested the book thanks to its reputation. Even Strange Violin contacted me to ask for a looksee. Because of its reputation.

Which reputation, may I remind you, is confused.

My Strange Violin editor was interested in making the novel more appealing to nonMormon audiences (which, natch, I was fine with). But I learned something this third edit.

Everyone reads differently.

Let's talk jokes because they probably play the most differently from person to person.

Banana grove?
Adored by some. First with-publisher edit required a lot of promprompromising that the joke worked and that people wouldn't throw the book across the room when they came to it. Second with-publisher edit didn't even blink at the joke.
Ctrl WWWWWWWWW
No one blinked at this until the most recent edit. Then I had to battle to keep it. And I haven't looked at the version you can buy. I don't know if it made it to print. But that's okay. I'm have no plans to look at the final version for years and years. A published book is a dead book. Or, rather, it's left my womb and gone to college and ain't nothing I can do no more.
May I help you?
Not really a joke (neither was the last one), but it's structured like a joke and it helps the novel maintain its comedic tone. But any joke you have to explain isn't funny. And if reader one thinks a joke isn't funny, then that reader will not believe anyone else will laugh either. Which makes trying to save jokes from editors difficult.

Each of these "jokes" has been loved by some readers while looked at skeptically by others. Knowing that the jokes on the chopping block this time were different from those on the chopping block last time was, yes, educational.

So what do we learn from this?

I have no idea.

What I'm waiting for now is more data.

What will the ratios be between the lovers, the haters, and the indifferent?

Read the book, then tell me how much you wished more jokes had been cut.


DANGER: BYUCK AHEAD