2021-09-03

If I keep reading poems and comics I may make it to a hundred this month

.

084) Now We're Getting Somewhere by Kim Addonizio, finished on August 27

I only knew Kim Addonizio from a very short story and its accompanying photo—but that was enough for me to remember her name and to allow the back of the book to hook me.

I love this collection. The poems are sharp and vernacular. They're recursive in interesting ways (references to Keats, sonnet-like sonnets) and they speak with complexity without pushing away. I enjoyed it immensely. I should have carried a pencil and then I could now be quoting lines.

I did not however. Alas.

Incidentally, I picked this up because it was in my 40ish-strong collection of recent collections that I've been acquiring from my neighbor's Little Free Library (everybody hopes she'll write them a review). For the first time, I dropped this stack of books on my AP kids, just to see what they would think. I'd assumed they would find the poems oppressive and impossible, but they settled right in and read. I had to interrupt them after an hour so we could talk about what they'd discovered. I was hella impressed, to be honest.

Good job, poets.

I only feel bad sneaking this one out for myself.

(Monday it goes back on the shelf for next time.)

two days


085) I Am Young by M. Dean, finished on August 30

Is it a novel? Is it a short story collection?

Sure.

It walks that line in a slightly more interesting way, however. All the stories are connected thematically (young people in love, with music) as they stretch over the Twentieth Century. One story in particular keeps getting revisited (they meet at a Beatles concert, they end up living together, they end up separated, they keep bumping into each other as Beatles die), largely in the form of letters written (or, finally, not written) to each other, their lives in parallel. Between these looks in, we visit other characters who struggle with mussy relationships.

Anyway, I liked it fine. It did some interesting things with form and color, but I rather doubt I'll remember it. Here the moment after a sudden wedding that should not have happened:


under a week


086) The Art of Charlie Chan Hock Chye presented by Sonny Liew, finished on August 31

HOLY SMOKES, YOU GUYS.

So, first, I loved this book. It's the story of a Singaporean comics artist who has spent his entire life struggling to do great work without money or acclaim. He tries on style after style and, although he executes them all with excellence, he ends up, to my Western eyes, as merely derivative of Tezuka of Pong or MAD or Carl Barks. But although he's borrowing other artists' vernacular, his uniquely Singaporean use of his talents is mindboggling. You want him to find success, even if the recognition comes too little too late ala Jack Kirby. His 1988 visit to San Diego Comic-Con International is particularly heartbreaking.

And through it all, Sonny Liew is our guide. It helps to have a native.

Anyway, it's a beautifully designed volume, generously including swathes of Chan's art through the various stages of his career.

But, it was a brilliant book—until I finished speedreading the endnotes and the acknowledgements and realizing halfway through this was the same author bio on the back of the book—and then I read the copyright page and it changed from merely a brilliant book to a work of genius. But please, don't start with the copyright page. Don't start by reading anything out there about the book. Just start at the beginning and make your way through.

since saturday


087) The Oven by Sophie Goldstein, finished on August 31

It's the distant future. Our heroes, man and wife, arrive at some galactic outpost to live in a trailer park where they will be free to live in the old way. To farm and have children. It's a wild and alien existence for them, even if to us it seems only fifty years past.

Of course, the plot thickens, etc.

I love the orange monochrome of the art. I like the simple character designs—one character always has closed eyes, like a Syd Hoff character. The book is very short, but it finds depth in its ambivalences.

required one bathroom break


088) Witchlight by Jessi Zabarsky, finished on September 3

Here's a fantasy novel that knows what themes are important to it but pushes them so hard that it confuses whatever the point was supposed to me. Which is too bad. Witchlight has plenty of cool and interesting elements (my favorite is the candle) but the hiccups in worldbuilding result in a largely confusing exercise.

The best example of what I'm talking about is its excision of men. Except at the very beginning and a couple moments near the end, there are no male characters. All characters are either female or female-adjacent genderqueer. Which could be fine, but then, with the introduction of a male character at the end who inflicts violence and it's supposed to mean something, the meaning is muddled. I could provide a couple interpretations but they would be contradictory.

I'm sure reading Witchlight will give the YA segment it's targeting some good feelings, but intellectually it's a bit vapid.

three or five days


089) Loverboys by Gilbert Hernandez, finished on September 3

This takes place in the same town as Marble Season although it's decidedly less kid-friendly. It deals with a divorced-woman stereotype. In this case, a teacher starts sleeping with men who were here students in their recent high-school past. It's a complicated thing. The most serious of them is the son of the widow who ran off with her husband, for instance.

Some of the moments near the end felt very familiar but I don't have a record of reading this book. Maybe it was excerpted in a Best American Comics.

I do love how Gilbert's smalltown stories feel so real while maintaining the ability to incorporate fantastical elements—sometimes big, sometimes small.

an afternoon

Previously . . . . :

2021-09-01

Augustus Filmius

.

HOME
library dvd
Scoob! (2020)

What's with you haters? I almost refused to watch this movie because of all you joyless monsters and I would have missed out.

Not I am not claiming perfection or greatness for this movie. Just that it is fun. And a lot of it.

It does have its flaws. Some of the character designs don't quite work (Daphne is waaay too pretty, the kid versions are too adult, Simon Cowell is so realistic he turns uncanny [and isn't it a little late for Simon Cowell to be your sole celebrity guest?), Will Forte's Shaggy falls short of what a voice actor could have done), but most of the complaints I anticipated having I do not.

Example: I thought this would be a origin story with kid versions of the characters annoying and floying their way through the film. Not so. In fact, the grow up a bit too fast leading into the most excellent rendition of the theme song which scratched many of my nostalgic itches.

Example: I thought from the trailer that this would break the cardinal rule of Scooby-Doo: no real monsters. (I first saw a Scooby-Doo film break this rule c. 2004 and I was outraged. I've watched very little new Scooby-Doo since.) It does in fact break this rule, but I'm okay with it because the film is not JUST a Scooby-Doo movie. It brings in other Hanna-Barbera properties and so the rules of THEIR worlds also become relevant. I'm still not totally on board, but it's okay for this movie.

(That said, the cosmic mumbojumbo that fuels the finale is nonsensical, and it appears they cut a key scene in which the one friendly robot converts others. I blame suits for this.)

Incidentally, before Space Jam took this to absurd lengths, Scoob! also played with the fact that these characters belong to a media conglomerate. It's a funny but mostly left me feeling slightly dirty.

It's kind of weird how Scoob! kind of expects us to remember these characters. Some of them are deep cuts unless you were ten years old and bored in 1977 or spend all your time now in front of Boomerang. I vaguely remember Dynomutt but I'm not sure I ever saw the show. I remember Captain Caveman but I don't remember Dee Dee so maybe he was in another show later? I remember Dick Dastardly (thought I thought it was Dirk) and Muttley but I couldn't tell you with certaintly how. And I'm turning 45 this week. I'm sure this was meant to relaunch all these characters but they're also meant to be nostalgic. All I can say is ymmv.

And I didn't read the reviews (just heard the gist) but I do wonder if the main complaint is people railing against Ecclesiastes, wishing for something new under the sun.

Yeah. Me too.


HOME
Disney+
Three Men and a Baby (1987)

I really shouldn't count this. I watched the first twenty and last five minutes. Son #3 picked it out for us to watch while we waited for his mom to be ready to take me to run some errands. The timing meant he watched the movie basically by himself. Which makes me feel bad. It was just started to get good when I left and it had just tumbled into sentimentality when I returned!

I suspect I have not seen this movie since seeing it in theaters as a kid. That's a long time.

I can't be sure what I would have thought had I seen the entire thing, but I was enjoying it well enough! Would watch again!

Incidentally, Ted Danson has gotten much more handsome since 1987. But I think this was peak-handsome Tom Selleck. Steve Guttenberg is also in this movie.


HOME
library dvd
Scoob! (2020)

Watched this with the kids who missed the first go-round and I have a couple comments to add

1. This is the first time I've ever thought Mark Wahlberg did a good job. I'm still skeptical he's Oscar-worthy, however.

I realized that the real reason I like this movie as much as I do is because it understands what is, in my opinion, the single most important thing about Scooby-Doo: Fred and Velma and Daphne and Scoob and Shaggy are people you want to be friends with. They're cool! And sure, this movie practically makes friendship the macguffin, but even with all the theatrics, it understands. It understands why we love the Mystery Inc. gang.

They are our friends.


HOME
Disney+
Black Widow (2021)

I don't understand how this character is still able to walk and maintain linear thought. We've seen her take a beating before, but never like this. I just don't get it.

Anyway, sorry ScarJo, but an unvaccinated wanted to watch this for his birthday so we bypassed the box office. Don't hold it against us.

This movie would have made more sense had it appeared between Civil War and Infinity War. They even had the location font the same as the former (or dang close)!

The post-titles sequence makes it clear that the Disney+ tv shows are connecting back the opposite direction as well. They're inseparable now.

ANYWAY. THE MOVIE.

The action scenes were incredible, the family cast was great, the biggest emotional leaps worked, and I liked it. But I don't know that it meant anything to me. How about you?


HOME
Disney+
Phantom of the Megaplex (2000)

Son #3 has been wanting to watch more Disney movies and he got this one onto the docket tonight.

It's about exactly what you'ld expect from a Disney Channel horror movie. It's a movie that's laughing with you because it too is laughing at itself.

Plus, Mickey Rooney. Crazy to think he still had another fourteen years of life (and movies) in him. He, um, was pretty old.


ELSEWHERE
Kanopy
Sylvio (2017) ×2

I don't grow tired of this movie though I've seen it enough times that I could fill up an IMDb goofs section. I won't, but I could.

Anyway, it's the story of a gorilla finding his place in the world! I like to think he succeeds.

Incidentally, since I last saw it, I found a connection between it and Fat City (1972).




ELSEWHERE
YouTube
The Giant Brine Shrimp (1973)

Okay, okay, okay, yes. I grant you. This is not long enough to count as a feature. But I just have too much to say about it not to write something longer than a tweet.

I had never heard of it before Laz added it to his list but I fit it in immediately. I'll talk about what it is in a second, but what it isn't is guilty of failing to be Utah in the way Laz describes this movie. This movie knows where it's at.

Anyway, the movie was cheap to make. It's clearly a one-person project. He filmed local stuff, put together some models and cut-up paper ala Gilliam, and that was about it. He needed a couple friends who'd always wanted to be filmed making out and some more willing to run through Salt Lake streets, but largely this is a film that was accomplished in a garage with razor blades and clay.

But the effects are great! The giant brine shrimp has character and is Harryhausenesque in movement. And the destruction of Saltair reminds me of Lotte Reiniger's work.

Anyway, the film charms, is occasionally hilarious, and any bitterness (alleged) on the part of the filmmaker has been bleached out by time.

Also, it has an AMAZING conclusion which I absolutely WILL NOT ruin for you.


HOME
library dvd
Contact (1997)

I first (and last) saw this c. 1997 in some house I'd never been in before and would never be in since as my parents took us on some sort of trip. It's fuzzy. And come to think of it, considering the order of my life post mission, let's adjust that circa to 1998.

ANYWAY, it's a great movie. It was great then, it's great now, and there were only a few bits I remembered. And some things I remembered quite incorrectly. For instance, I'd conflated the evil religious and the sensible religious characters. And I could have sworn there was another song in the opening sequence, but I didn't hear it this time.

Also, watching that opening sequence, I felt certain that the final sequence of Men in Black must have parodied it—but, in fact, Men in Black opened a week earlier. Just the zeitgeist, I guess.

More likely are the Jurassic Park references (red jeep, Puerto Rico, talking to kids, "clever girl"). But [citation needed].

The film's a terrific time capsule. The early worldwide web, Bill Clinton, hyper-religious political , transition from sets and mattes to digital effects. It's a good way to remember the Nineties (if remembering the Nineties is something you want to do).

But the film is still most valuable because it is an excellent, both exciting and intellectual, film with a fine cast doing good work, a complex but reasonable plot, hefty philosophical ideas about epistemology and the nature of meaning, of being human.

The obvious more-recent film to connect is Arrival. And rightly so. They are both such generous films and they both deal with first contact. They both feature a fraught romantic relationship that serves to contrast philosophies. They both contrast the scientific community with the political and military communities—and to those prone to extremism. They both star short, lovely, and absolutely brilliant actresses working at the very top of their craft—and their feminineness is key to their character or, more specifically, to how other characters see their character. All the same, they're quire different films. I wouldn't want to argue between them.




Previous films watched

MOST RECENT POST

2021
jan feb mar apr may
jun jul aug sep oct nov dec

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2021-08-26

Reading comics under the old oak tree

 

.

076) The House by Paco Roca, finished on August 11

This is a wonderfully adult comic. Three siblings, now grown, working on their father's beloved vacation home, after his death. Roca's incredible sense of anatomy and gesture and body language is the perfect synecdoche of everything he does well. I assume this is in translation so part of the execution is thanks to the English-language team, but character and dialogue and detail all come together to make us part of this family, if only for a hundred or two pages.

One fascinating page—the family tree, you'll know it when you see it— directs the eye in directions I'm not sure I've ever seen before. If you're interested in panel construction, this page alone is worth getting the book!

three days


077) Are Comic Books Real? by Alex Nall, finished on August 13

These slice-of-life stories from an actual teacher are some of the best stuff I've read on being inside the classroom. I can fit on a cozy shelf with Up the Down Staircase.

He works with elementary-aged kids, doing things like comics class and digital-art class and moviemaking class. Only a sliver of my career was spent with kids these age, but he captures my memories precisely.

It's hilarious at times, too. If that's what you're into.

an evening


078) Top Ten by Alan Moore and Gene Ha, finished on August 16

Here's the basic set-up. So many superheros show up in the 20th century that eventually there are just two much of them. To solve the problem, they go live in their own city. (Which, naturally, is connected to like cities in other universes and dimensions.) Because it's a city of supers, all the parts of a city are also filled with supers. Cab drivers, prostitutes, delinquent kids, insurance salesmen, and, most importantly for this story, cops.

This books is supposed to be, basically, a police procedural. One of the things it inadvertently emphasizes is how much we accept state-sanctioned violence. Most of these cops are pretty awful, at least sometimes. It's supposed to be a buddy-buddy precinct ala the Nine-Nine but the characters are less interesting as people and we can no longer ignore the quasifascist horrors they proudly represent.

Moore is a good late-twentieth century manly-man scifi liberal (the stories in this issue were published 1999 – 2001) much like what I'm seeing in Frederik Pohl's Jem (1980). They each imagine a world in which diversity is broad and accepted—perhaps even celebrated—on the surface. Below the surface, everyone is still the same: sexist, homophobic, racist, nationalist, etc. The main difference is the lesbians get to be as womanizing as the men; if you think all [insert slur here] are [insert stereotype here], you can say so to their face; and one person's awful thinking won't prevent the people they think awfully about from loving them (and vice versa).

I suppose we used to think this was a realistic view of how liberalism would succeed? Now it just seems pretty unimaginative.

Anyway, the greatest thing about this book is probably this: having an entire city of superheros means you get to invent a ton of superheros. All kinds of character designs and new powers, etc etc. And the Moore/Ha team wasn't shy to insert tons of puns and jokes into building signage and such. The landscape is much more fun than the main characters or what they're up to.

Check out this young robot and his super dog:

Tell me that ain't delightful.

about six days


079) Baby-sitters Little Sister: Karen's Roller Skates by Katy Farina, finished on August 17

Charming. Simple. Professionally executed. Just as fun to read aloud.

Would read more!

one bedtime


080) Lulu Anew by Étienne Davodeau, finished on August 17

I suspect this will be the best comic I read this year. It's a quiet story, beginning with friends talking about their friend who disappeared. The bits of story are shared by one and another until the story arrives at the point the story began. That's a structural gimmick I'm usually annoyed by, but it's so appropriate to the theme here, I turned right back to page one and continued in round. I may have read the entire thing again were it not already so late and I have work together.

Davodeau feels no need to make anyone beautiful. But we can see family resemblances and so much is told through the holding of a shoulder or the turn of a head. And the muted colors and the deliberate pacing and the absolute mystery, moment to moment. Every bit of foreshadowing is ambiguous in ways that, in most stories, would feel deceptive. And although nothing really resolved, I am so satisfied.

Probably part of that is all the little parallels embedded in the story. Some are deliberate, but some—like the daughter's coming of age alongside her mother's adventure—are much more important and never scream to be noticed.

And certainly the morality of her journey is never decided upon. This is a work that asks plenty of questions, but never so clearly that you can guess at the answers.

An impressive work of art.

Incidentally, the French title was Lulu femme nue. I love how well the English title captures both that sound and meaning.

two nights


081) The Nature of Oaks: The Rich Ecology of Our Most Essential Native Trees by Douglas W. Tallamy, finished on August 24


I love oak trees. I'm not sure if Tehachapi made that so or if it predates my time there, but I love oak trees. They have personality and nobility.

And, as it ends up, they are the core to life in North America.

And even were they not vital to restoring our native animals etc this book demonstrates that they are home to thrilling dramas for all sizes of life—particularly the very small.

Tallamy's book attempts hard to cover the whole continent, but he can't overcome his east-coast bias. I forgive him though because he really does make the effort.

The main conceit is following a tree he planted through one year of its young maturity, September to September. In its branches are birds and caterpillars and wasps too tiny to notice, each engaged in the struggle to survive.

Tallamy's not a great stylist or anything but I was thrilled throughout this book. Read it, then plant a couple oaks of your own. 

two weeks or more


082) Thor: The Goddess of Thunder by Aaron/Dauterman/Molina, finished on August 24

I don't remember the impulse that got me to put this on hold. I've been aware of this storyline since it came out (although I've never known much about it; and what I did now is a spoiler for a later volume). It was reasonably entertaining and I enjoyed it well enough but I was not really, shall we say, thrilled. It was fine.

how long goes here

083) Pashima by Nidhi Chanani, finished on August 25

The blurbs from Gene Luen Yang and Victoria Jamieson let you know where First Second's intentions were with this book. And I think it probably works fine for the target audience. But me, I found it too ambiguous for my taste.

This is not me opposing ambiguity. Ambiguity's great. But it needs to have purpose and a lot of the contradictions in this text didn't hold together for me.

two nights


Previously . . . . :

2021-08-24

Irreantum on Kickstarter!

 .

The latest issue of Irreantum is (unofficially) live (it will be official tomorrow when a] it's the 177th anniversary of the key text and b], hopefully, the ebook is there for download) and we're trying something new:

Paying people.

Where will the money come from?

Kickstarter.

Please click on the photo and check it out! I collected a lot of serious feathers from Middle Harbor Shoreline Park so I'm ready to go!



2021-08-10

Five comics (and novel makes six)

.

070) It's a Magical World by Bill Watterson, finished on July 29

Someone picked this book from a free pile last week and today it is already loved into a pretty rough shape. But the kids love it, young and old, delighted to read some Calvin and Hobbes strips they had not before read (let alone dozens of times).

I finally got my hands on it. As I assumed from the collection's title, this takes us into the final stretch of Calvin and Hobbes, ending with the final strip. But there are hints throughout that Watterson is done. Take this from the final week:

But this isn't to suggest that he was coasting. Not at all. The art is still spectacular, the writing still clever and wise.

It's a generous close to his decade-long run and I hope we're all still grateful.

how long goes here


071) Future Day Saints: The Gnolaumite Crystal by Matt Page, finished on August 1

Some where (can't find it now) Matt wrote about feeling a bit sheepish he was shortlisted for the AML Award for comics with the first volume of this series. And really, just sheepish with how much buzz and talk as comics that book received. So resolved to make volume two include more comics.

Which made me glad as, frankly, I felt rather the same. And I am very pleased to say that this book is everything—as comics—that the first book was merely almost.

This book engages more deeply with the capabilities of graphic storytelling. Plus, it's just more interesting! The explanation of Triple Combination's past is nothing I've ever seen before and I'm excited to see where Matt goes next.

The noncomics bits (eg, the advertisements for the Future Day Saints vhs tapes) are as delightful as ever and take up the appropriate amount of space, imho. The bad guys got more interesting and the rules of this world were muddied—not in a Matt-doesn't-know-what-the-heck-he's-doing sort of way, but in a there's-a-lot-here-yet-to-be-explored sort of way.

Volume two came out much much faster than I anticipated. Here's to hoping volume three has just as speedy an arrival!

one day


072) Dutch House by Ann Patchett, finished on August 5

Lady Steed and I read and loved Bel Canto simultaneously. Since then, she has read several more of Patchett's books. I have not until now, with The Dutch House.

I read an article over Lady Steed's shoulder—an interview with Patchett about the novel and about its painting and about the audiobook narrated by her friend Tom Hanks. Lady Steed had already read the book and was almost finished with the audiobook, but we had a long drive ahead of us and she was happy to start over. So I listened to the first fifty pages via Tom Hanks's (excellent) narration (and, later, another twenty or thirty pages in the middle) while reading the rest myself.

Anyway, so it's about this house. Not really, obviously, but also, it is. It's about unique miseries and unique privileges and, specifically, the people these things happen to. The characters never stay one-dimensional, even when other characters try to make them so. The plot unfolds almost invisibly even though this is a novel that provides surprise after surprise.

In the end, it is another work of beauty and honesty. And it makes you wonder why we all haven't read more Ann Patchett.

Anyway, as I type, I realize I'm loathe to give anything away even though I think nothing I might give away could negatively impact your experience.

Your potential experience is simply to wonderful for me to put my grubby little hands upon.

maybe eight days


073) Long Walk to Valhalla by Adam Smith and Matthew Fox, finished on August 7

I wish I liked this book more than I did. Visually, it seemed to be taking some (less exagerrated cues) from Jeff Lemire. It's trying to tie into a curious mix of Norse and Christian mythologies. It mixes realism and fantasy. It's fun monochrome. It's a lot of stuff I like!

But . . . I never quite understood what it was all about. And I'm not convinced the creators do either.

I could (and would if this were a paid review) reread it a couple times and see if it comes together. But I'm not going to. I have three more library comics to read!

over midnight

Weirdly, however, these next two comics from the library, are NOT among the three I mentioned. It's fun to have long lunches across the street from a library!
 
074) House of Women by Sophie Goldstein, finished on August 10

The black-and-while style ranges from modern European comics to old medieval European art to art nouveau to, most deliberately, Japanese woodcuts.

It's a story in the far future. A group of colonialist nuns are sent by the Empire to see if the native population of this island can be civilized. What follows is a wealth of yonic images and an exploration of sex, violence, and cultural collision. It's a fascinating book.

Plus, props for one of the finest author bios I've seen.


at lunch



075) Through the Woods by Emily Carroll, finished on August 10

I had read one of the stories from this anthology before—online, I believe—but can't remember where. I remember how great it was, however. And every one of the little horror stories in the collection is at least good and some are much more than that. The library has it in the YA schedule and I guess so. I'm checking it out to share with my 12yrold. But oooooooo, be careful.

(This image is from the story I had previously read, but I found it somewhere else. Click it to get your second witness!)

at lunch


Previously . . . . :

2021-08-08

Prayer as a Creative Act (the intro svithe)

 

.

Last time I shared the multiversal version of this presentation. But the first half was more or less the same each time I did it. It’s also available with my notes (it’s “z Outline v2”), but maybe this version (shorter, cleaner) will be an easier format to share.

----------------------------------------

We are children of God, children of creators, children of Heavenly Parents.

Before we get to my main point, let me remind you of two obvious things that maybe almost two years of Zoom have made fuzzy:

1.    Class works best when people talk

a.     Fifty brains are better than one. Even when that one is mine.

b.    Turn to your neighbor and tell them how many masks you own.

2.    Tangents are wonderful things

3.    The real goal is to think new thoughts.

a.     It doesn’t matter as much that we agree.

b.    Let the Spirit in through the unfamiliar or the weird.

4.    So speak, interrupt, propose.

At this point, I asked someone to grab the chalk and write on the board people’s favorite scripture stories. After they shared what they (you?) liked about that story, I did the same, with a focus on what makes that prayer unique in my mind. Some really fun examples came up, including Enos’s all-nighter, Hezekiah’s plea to live, the Lamanite king’s desire to know God, an alternate version of the First Vision, Nephi’s desire to see his father’s vision, Jesus’s prayers on the cross and in Gethesemane, and more more more. It’s a fun exercise. I recommend it.

I teach high-school English and one thing I have to do is cure people of the five-paragraph essay. Today, we’re going to dismiss the 5p-essay of prayer and discuss how to make the prayer take the shape of whatever is in our heart.

I suppose the 5p-essay of Latter-day Saint prayer is the four-part prayer we learned in primary or from the missionaries.

This not me knocking the primary prayer. Just questioning whether it’s really the right form for every prayer you ever say.

(Then we considered how well the prayers on the chalkboard matched the primary prayer.)

Great. Now let’s skip from English class to math class for a second.

Welcome to geometry class. (Not really, but the idea of sacred geometries is a pretty great thing to research if you get serious about more creative prayers.)

Let’s talk about Euclid, the father of geometry, dead lo these 2300 years.

His geometry relied on five axioms—ideas that seemed safe to assume and, having assumed them, on which the rest of geometry can be built. Euclid wasn’t sure that last one was true, but he felt he needed it in order to father geometry.

Now we have non-Euclidean geometry which presents a new way of understanding the world by rejecting Euclid’s axiom #5.

There are a lot of axioms in religion. I started us today with this one:

We are children of God, children of creators, children of Heavenly Parents.

Here are a couple others:

Bible dictionary bit

Abraham prays for Sodom and Gomorrah (I forgot this in both presentations!)

This aligning of wills isn’t so simple as just lying down and saying thy will be done in every single circumstance.

            Isaiah 1: “Come now, and let us reason together,” says the Lord

Prayer is remembering to pray

            Adam Miller, Letters to a Young Mormon

            Remembering to speak AND remembering to listen

Pray always and not faint

D&C 88 126 Pray always, that ye may not faint, until I come. Behold, and lo, I will come quickly, and receive you unto myself. Amen.

D&C 75 11 Praying always that they faint not; and inasmuch as they do this, I will be with them even unto the end.

from Middlemarch:

Mr Bulstrode is a man who has lived most of his life trying to be as good as possible, donating money and being ostentatiously religious, etc. But his fortune is built on another man’s crimes and Mr Bulstrode did some shady stuff himself in order for it to fall to him.

Early in the morning—about six—Mr. Bulstrode rose and spent some time in prayer. Does any one suppose that private prayer is necessarily candid—necessarily goes to the roots of action? Private prayer is inaudible speech, and speech is representative: who can represent himself just as he is, even in his own reflections?

While we will speak mostly of words, words have their limitations. Prayer can and must, at least at times, be more.

But even more importantly, prayer cannot be more honest than we are with ourselves.

So our axioms are:

1.    We are children of Heavenly parents

a.     They are interested in us

b.    We are creators like them

2.    Prayer is an aligning of wills between us and deity

3.    Prayer is remember to pray

a.     Pray always and not faint

4.    We pray as ourselves.

a.     We thus must be honest in order to pray honestly.

(Note: because of directions the conversation took, sometimes these axioms had been slightly altered by this point.)

I’m proposing these as axioms but we’re all limited by what we can see. Perhaps one of these is like parallel lines.

And here’s something axiomatic about creativity:

            Sometimes creativity is doing something new.

            Sometimes it’s doing something old in a new way.

But even the most traditional of prayers can be creative—can be the right prayer at times.

The Lord’s Prayer (specifically, an anecdote about a woman in my growing-up ward who, giving the closing prayer at Church, who said this was an appropriate moment to pray via classic.)

Then I handed out the English version of Gabriel González Núñez fascinating experiment with the Lord’s Prayer (eng, esp) and we spent a moment with it, trying to hear these familiar words for the first time.

Now we will do something similar. Just as there are plenty of ways we can read the Lord’s prayer, there are plenty of ways we can finish this hour. I have multiple options for us. We’ll do one from each category until we run out of time.

And that’s when we did the voting!

(On which you can learn more by clicking on the poll. I only wish more people had followed the link and the voting, thus, would have been more fierce. Ah well.)

previous svithe

2021-08-07

Prayer as a Creative Act (a svithe)

 

.

I was asked to present at an LDS singles conference on the topic of prayer and meditation. I decided to pick Prayer as a Creative Act as my theme. I also assembled my presentation in such a way that it was impossible to cover everything I had in mind to cover. This was inspired in part by a poem (if we can call it that) by Gabriel González Núñez (eng, esp) and in part by a sense that, rather than just the impression of chaos, my presentation should, because of its theme, actually embrace chaos.

I promised to post a fuller sense of the possibilities here.

After my introduction (I’ll put that in a separate email/post in a couple days) I had them vote on where we would go next. This is what the second group chose:

We had time to cover Praying in song, Other faith traditions, and The Evolving Metaphor of the Tree. The first group, incidentally, also discussed those three, albeit not in the same order. Guess you 18- – 30-year-olds have consistent taste!

I won’t put everything here—just a bit—sometimes the links are enough—but if you want to hear more about what I was hoping for, leave a comment here on Thutopia, over at Thubstack, or hit me up on Thwitter.

(Incidentally, if you don’t mind things being idiosyncratically arranged, you can see my actual [and fuller] files here.)

What the groups voted to talk about it is in bold and italic below. As you will quickly notice, we didn’t have time for that much. Which is great! because it means we had actual discussion which is more valuable than me blabbing anyway.

🛐 Bless this [our daily] bread

  • Why do we bless the food? (This a socratic pickle my brother likes posing and the lack of a good answer has made me rethink much about the way I pray.)

  • Rewriting the sacrament prayer

🛐 Poetry

🛐 Fiction (click over to the files to see the excerpts under discussion)

🛐 Location (I had minimal plans for any of these; I fully expected to pose a question and then turn it over to them.)

  • Church

  • Home

  • Mountain

  • Wilderness

🛐 The Evolving Metaphor of the Tree (lots of exciting news on trees the last few years but most of what I talked about came from this recent book review; for this I mentioned the history of tree symbolism [including Mother God and rugged individualism], then just gave some fun facts and asked them to create new religious metaphors using trees)

  • Canopy in the sky

  • Canopy in the soil

🛐 Praying in Song

🛐 Paintings of the First Vision (this link goes to the raw materials I used for my presentation last year and what I planned to pull up for this presentation this year; this link goes to the notes for that presentation; and this link goes to that presentation itself)

🛐 More on not fainting

🛐 Other faith traditions (ALL of these are much more complete in my notes; look for the file Other faith traditions in the folder xx and check out the relevant images in the top folder)

  • The four forms of prayer in Catholicism (I’ve also see it as three or five forms, but it’s the same basic list.)

  • St Teresa on (not) praying bashfully (St. Teresa of Avila has a LOT to say on prayer, but I thought this was particularly great—hit up my files to read the excerpt)

  • A tidbit from the Quran (“Resort to patience and Prayer for help. Truly Prayer is burdensome for all except the devout, who realize that ultimately they will have to meet their Lord and that to Him they are destined to return.“—I also wanted to set this next to the Parable of the Talents to see what would happen.)

  • The Buddha on prayer (although I had several sources, this is probably the most succinct)

  • Sacrifice of animals (I had no plan for this one. Just looking to see where we might go.)

  • Ohlone Prayer in the Four Directions (I was really hoping for this one, but Mormons love their Buddhism.)

🛐 The Old Testament (I had ideas for defamiliarizing prayer using each of these; reach out and we can talk about them!)


=====================================================
=====================================================


Anyway, that’s all that makes sense to put into the world in this format. I’ll post the intro in a few days, but do talk back about anything you want me to clarify or explain or debate.

previous svithe