.
Instead of a bunch of different gadgets, I would like to buy just one device with the following specs:
Big enough screen to watch movies on
Portable so that can be done in bed
Run MS Word (included)
Run Adobe CS (included)
Do basic video and audio editing
Carry all my books around with me
Use e-ink so a single charge can last weeks
Hold at least 45 cubic feet of frozen food
Shave my face completely clean in under a minute
Autobackup to the cloud
Texting and email no matter where I am
Have a physical presense that's aesthetically pleasing
Wash dishes using less water than when I do them by hand
Pedometer and accelerometer
Have respectable fidelity when playing music
Wireless
And if we could keep it under 2k, that would be awesome.
kthnxbye
2010-06-30
2010-06-28
xkqgulzjvyuiop
.
Hey, Wired Googlers.
FTR, I too thought they just made it up.
(Can't hurt to be sure, right?)
Hey, Wired Googlers.
FTR, I too thought they just made it up.
(Can't hurt to be sure, right?)
2010-06-25
Was the best innovation of 2009 a throwback to our lost past?
-or-
Why DC's Wednesday Comics were so darn great
.
Note: This was originally written for Fantasy Magazine many months ago, but then they changed all their plans for writing about comics and so they no longer need it. So I'm throwing it up here and on Fob Comics instead. We'll call this apropos rather than horribly too late because the comics under discussion were just collected in hardcover and released on the first of this month.
.
Note: This was originally written for Fantasy Magazine many months ago, but then they changed all their plans for writing about comics and so they no longer need it. So I'm throwing it up here and on Fob Comics instead. We'll call this apropos rather than horribly too late because the comics under discussion were just collected in hardcover and released on the first of this month.
.
Was the best innovation of 2009 a throwback to our lost past?
-or-
Why DC's Wednesday Comics were so darn great
I recall reading the daily comics as Bill Watterson's Calvin lamented the state of the modern comic strip. Watterson himself used all his power to fight for a full half page on Sundays at the end of his run and those strips still seem revolutionary. But really, he was just hearkening back to the era of Grand Art in the newspapers' funny pages.
Our modern Sunday sheet doesn't have any great panoramic views such as Nemo in Slumberland nor do we have much left in the way of grand adventure ala Hal Foster or Chester Gould. Most papers are crammed full of joke stgrips. And, sure, Pearls Before Swine is brilliant, but a hilarious eight-panel (crammed into so small a space only the simplest line drawings read) is only one sliver of Sundaycomics' heritage. But we haven't room anymore for the grand or the beautiful.
Enter Wednesday Comics.
For twelve weeks in mid 2009, DC released not-full-sized-but-still-good- sized broadsheets and handed full pages over to writer/artist teams to tell a story over twelve episodes and the results were generally pretty good. Good enough that my only regret is that each story was only and exactly twelve episodes long, and at the end of those twelve weeks, Wednesday Comics was over.
While one advantage of newspaper comics is their endless nature, my own nature as a reader prefers beginnings and endings. But if a few of Wednesday Comics' stories had ended at nine weeks and others at fifteen and as one dropped out another took its place and WC had become an institution --- how cool would that have been?
But they didn't and so it goes. Here's to hoping that, at the very least, WC was successful enough to justify a second twelve-week run next year. Because the grand scope of a single story splayed over one large piece of paper is a thing of beauty and something worth experiencing again, for the first time.
Now for brief reviews of all the stories.
No fantasy here. This is a straight Batman story, with the knight of the night in pure detective mode. It's a fine story, but reading on, one is left to wonder, with all the DC characters to choose from, why would anyone pick Batman? (Or Superman for that matter.) With DC's universe of underdeveloped and deliriously fun tertiary characters to choose from, why pick a character everyone knows, and tell a workaday story about him? It doesn't make much sense. Even if it is a good story.
From my own reading, I am only really familiar with Jack Kirby's work from the end of his life --- when he was merely a shell of the Jack Kirby who created the modern superhero.
Kamandi however is a character of Kirby's from the early '70s, and the energy and strength of Sook's art and the wild adventure of Gibbons's story helps me understand what the big deal with Kirby has always been about. This is the best Kirby story I've ever read, even if Kirby did not directly touch it.
Kamandi lives in a distant future where humans are all but destroyed (he is, after all, "The Last Boy on Earth") and sentient anthropomorphic animals battle across the demolished American landscape. The villains here (as in two more WC stories to come) are a band of apes who intend to rule the entire landscape. They have kidnapped the king of the tigers, a friend of Kamandi's, and are planning to execute him. Naturally, the heroic human rides to the rescue, uniting tigers and dogs and lions on his way.
While in many respects a straightforward postapocalyptic adventure, Kamandi uses quiet moments between the violence and explosions to explore concepts like loneliness and loyalty and family and morality. A couple surprising turns and genuine rapport between the characters makes this tale a real winner. I wouldn't be surprised to see Kamandi resurrected again as this story inspires other artists.
For a moment, Superman almost becomes exactly who Lex Luthor has always said he is: an alien with no real ties to Earth.
During an attack from other, more monstrous aliens, a comment from one fills him with insecurity regarding his status as an adopted Earthling, So Supes heads home to Ma and Pa Kent in hope of regaining his bearing.
Though merely a simple and classic Superman tale (told in an overwrought visual style not well matched to newsprint), this story does reveal what Wednesday Comics' form can do best: Art done large.
Deadman's afterlife heroics done large. Even suddenly alive again, Deadman looks like a corpse (which is fine, I suppose, since, much as you know a dead Superman will someday return to life, a living Deadman will necessarily return to death), but alive or dead, he abandons himself to doing the right thing, no matter what it may be. And entangeld in a web of demon-evil hijinks, he is level-headed enough to see that even attractive evils are evil.
The ugly demons --- the ones that distract the reader from the pretty ones --- are truly hideous. And the monstrous hell Bullock creates is one of the greatest creations in all of WednesdayComics. And, curious among this set of deliberately ended comics, Deadman leaves us with something of a cliffhanger.
A mashup of Cartoon Network and Mad Men, the thrust is not on the alien invasion, but on the bromance between Green Lantern Hal Jordan and an old astronaut friend. The story is highly professional and manipulative, but it's too effective (and thus charming and lovable and even moving) to really hold its machinations against it. It makes you smile? It makes you tear up? Well, even if it was manipulative, we all want that experience from time to time.
Gaiman has long claimed that he writes his scripts to match the strengths of the artist he is working with, but never has that been more clear than here. Mike Allred's pop sensibilities rule every square millimeter of all twelve pages, with his wife Laura Allred's colors blinding us with that rapid cheerfulness the Allreds are masters of. It's not till near the end of the run, when Metamorpho works his way through the Periodic Table of the Elements (looking like a board game --- another Allredian conceit for sure), that the brilliant wordplay finally reveals that Gaiman had a hand in this at all. His genius for goofing off finally shines though Allred's genius for goofing off, and this pastiche of '60s silliness hits its highest point. What this world needs more of, it is clear, are more more more Gaiman/Allred collaborations.
One of the weaker stories and one of the harder to access without a decent background in DCology. It's a typical comic-book monstrosity with switchbacks and hidden identities and amnesia and time travel and sudden reveals and, yawn, so on. And, like Superman before it, a little too gray and brown for newsprint.
Adam Strange is one of the strangest characters DC has produced, and Paul Pope, coming off a string of successes in the strange, is well suited to tackle Adam as he cavorts with his metalbikini-clad love against an army of bad-tempered blue monkeys. Curiously, the story is not weakened --- or even destrangified --- by the sudden return of Adam to Earth where he is --- gasp! --- old and boring.
Pope's wiggly lines bring Strange's world to life in a way a more traditional, cleaner line never could have. He moves Strange from the realm of the strange curiosity, to the realm of the strangely real.
This is the silly one. Others may have aimed for silly, but this one is silly. But, even though the original 1959 Supergirl was silly, she was treated by her creators with contempt. It's clear Palmiotti and Conner love their Supergirl, even if she is stuck chasing a silly superdog and a silly supercat as they engage in silly misadventures.
But though this silly Supergirl is lovingly presented, she's not apt to make feminists proud. She asks for help solving her problem from a young man, then her problem is explained to her by an old man, and her problem is finally solved by a dog and a cat.
In the end, although Supergirl saves a plane filled with people, she never really acts --- she is only acted upon. And that makes her a dull hero.
Also, she is very silly.
The Metal Men are and have always been goofy. And DiDio plays that goofiness to the hilt with punny titles and campy dialogue, and the artists do their part to make the characters and their world as haha as possible. And that devotion to humor pays off when a genuine menace threatens to destroy them all. Having laughed with the Metal Men, we can't bear to see them die! A simple story well played.
While Wonder Woman seems as prone to the ordinary as Batman and Superman, Caldwell instead brings us an origin story of a young Diana, navigating her physical dreams of our world, that is structured like a classic folk tale. He lays it out in a more complicated and daring style, then draws it in a style so European I kept checking to see if maybe, I don't know, Nicolas de Crécy was doing the art.
The melding colors and complex painterly style don't always read well on newsprint (definitely don't try reading this in bed with only a small bedside lamp as your companion), but the artistic ambition of this Wonder Woman is to be lauded.
Another story without any fantastic elements, the classic Nazi fighter gets roughed up but holds his ground. This looks and tastes much like the original, which seems compliment enough.
The first few weeks, this page was split in half, between a Flash story and an Iris story. Two views of the same relationship, one from his perspective, one from hers. His told in a classic superhero look, hers approximating classic mid-century newspaper stories of strong women.
The Iris half of the tale was abandoned however. My suspicion is that the writers found it too difficult to maintain her half of the story while Flash is multiplying himself and fighting gorillas. He's just way cooler, right?
But I think that decision was a tragedy. The counterpoint of a normal human's p-o-v offered a sense of reality to an otherwise far over-the-top story. Too bad they stopped thinking the human experience merited half their time.
Unfortunately disjointed, this ambitious-seeming but ultimately overly simple story may be the best proof that Wednesday Comics should have been made ongoing. Simonson simply bit off too much with this story and wrapping it up in twelve weeks resulted in something much less that what might have been. The iambic pentameter-spewing demon fighting his centuries-dead nemesis while Catwoman struggles not to be a pawn --- the story had potential. Would it had been given the weeks necessary to fully unfold. Twenty weeks maybe. By then it would have been surrounded by all new stories, and, upon ending, replaced itself by some new and marvelous and perhaps even forgotten character.
Exactly.The sepia-toned heightened reality of Baker's Hawkman is the perfect final page. Pure superhero and purely ridiculous. Let's start with aliens! Then let's have dinosaurs! And then sea monsters! But, amazingly, it all pulls together. Village Voice got it right when, choosing this story as one of the best comics of 2009, they wrote "slashing and comically arrogant Hawkman . . . proved it's often secondary heroes who are ripest for artistic extravagance."
Bring us another twelve weeks next year, DC.
Or, even better, bring us fifty-two.
2010-06-22
School lunch
.
Everyone knows that schools save pennies and screw our kids by calling potato chips a serving of vegetables so they can meet the federal guidelines for a healthy lunch without actually having to prepare anything healthful. But now a new innovation is coming in the further save pennies and screw children.
But first, some good news.
Have you seen the Sun Chips ads for their new compostable bags? Made of corn, they biodegrade in a matter of weeks. The same compostable "plastic" is also appearing in disposable drinking glasses, etc.
Back to the bad news. Sun Chips, delicious as they are, shouldn't be a serving of vegetables. And they haven't been because they cost more than frfrozen french fries. But now with a bag made from corn they count as TWO servings of vegetables and are, thus, a cheaper veggie delivery system.
And if you serve a kid his milk not in a cardboard box but a corn-made cup? Dairy and veggie. Baddabing.
I work in the school and I understand the budget crunch, but this loopholery takes us to a new level of disturbing.
Kids shouldn't be expected to eat the bag.
(And the fact that they just toss their green beans in the trash as well ain't no kind of excuse.)
Everyone knows that schools save pennies and screw our kids by calling potato chips a serving of vegetables so they can meet the federal guidelines for a healthy lunch without actually having to prepare anything healthful. But now a new innovation is coming in the further save pennies and screw children.
But first, some good news.
Have you seen the Sun Chips ads for their new compostable bags? Made of corn, they biodegrade in a matter of weeks. The same compostable "plastic" is also appearing in disposable drinking glasses, etc.
Back to the bad news. Sun Chips, delicious as they are, shouldn't be a serving of vegetables. And they haven't been because they cost more than frfrozen french fries. But now with a bag made from corn they count as TWO servings of vegetables and are, thus, a cheaper veggie delivery system.
And if you serve a kid his milk not in a cardboard box but a corn-made cup? Dairy and veggie. Baddabing.
I work in the school and I understand the budget crunch, but this loopholery takes us to a new level of disturbing.
Kids shouldn't be expected to eat the bag.
(And the fact that they just toss their green beans in the trash as well ain't no kind of excuse.)
2010-06-20
Compelled to be humble
(a svithe)
.
Being humble is not my forte. Or, rather, pretending to be less awesome than I am has never been my forte. Which is not how I define humility, though, in my observation, that is the most commonly used definition of the word.
Humility (in my definition) is keeping one's by-virtue-of-being-a-child-of-god awesomeness in perspective. Or, in other words, most people are at least a little awesome some of the time and --- strikes me as likely --- the parents of all this awesome must be awesomer still.
None of which is what I mean to be writing. As per the title, circumstances are compelling me to be humble. Which leads closely to my second definition of humility: placing one's awesomeness higher than such things as faith hope and charity. This is a crime I am quite adept at, as hinted in that initial hyperlink.
And therefore, the vital question posed for me is what's most important.
What is most important.
Being humble is not my forte. Or, rather, pretending to be less awesome than I am has never been my forte. Which is not how I define humility, though, in my observation, that is the most commonly used definition of the word.
Humility (in my definition) is keeping one's by-virtue-of-being-a-child-of-god awesomeness in perspective. Or, in other words, most people are at least a little awesome some of the time and --- strikes me as likely --- the parents of all this awesome must be awesomer still.
None of which is what I mean to be writing. As per the title, circumstances are compelling me to be humble. Which leads closely to my second definition of humility: placing one's awesomeness higher than such things as faith hope and charity. This is a crime I am quite adept at, as hinted in that initial hyperlink.
And therefore, the vital question posed for me is what's most important.
What is most important.
2010-06-15
Muzzled
.
In order to avoid offending any more people and thus causing them to lock themselves in their bathrooms for months at a time, from now on, Thutopia will only republish LOLcats vetted by a panel of persnickety marms and email forwards sent to me by members of said panel.
In order to avoid offending any more people and thus causing them to lock themselves in their bathrooms for months at a time, from now on, Thutopia will only republish LOLcats vetted by a panel of persnickety marms and email forwards sent to me by members of said panel.
2010-06-09
Suck on a pansy
(they're totally nontoxic)
.
So what with all the cadmiumwear at McDonald's and Walmart, and with my recent learning that the flower foxgloves are totally toxic (not to mention hydrangeas and calla lilies, both of which grow in our very yard), I am starting to become concerned for the Children of America. Ergo, this list of safe things to suck.
Pansies.
Golden scepters (20kt min).
Fish (fresh, not from Louisiana).
Marble angels (available free at most public cemeteries).
Hermetically sealed Frenchmen.
Celery.
But especially pansies.
So what with all the cadmiumwear at McDonald's and Walmart, and with my recent learning that the flower foxgloves are totally toxic (not to mention hydrangeas and calla lilies, both of which grow in our very yard), I am starting to become concerned for the Children of America. Ergo, this list of safe things to suck.
Pansies.
Golden scepters (20kt min).
Fish (fresh, not from Louisiana).
Marble angels (available free at most public cemeteries).
Hermetically sealed Frenchmen.
Celery.
But especially pansies.
2010-06-08
Little Happy Secrets
.
I just read this play and even though I won't get to see this production, I still feel it's worthy to contribute towards. Amazing.
I just read this play and even though I won't get to see this production, I still feel it's worthy to contribute towards. Amazing.
2010-06-07
Feedback, please.
.
Do not use Google. Do not sleep on it. Do not read the other comments before commenting yourself.
Now:
Look at these two book-cover images. (There are two because the second image will probably replace the one in the current cover.)
Imagine you're walking through the bookstore or browsing an online bookstore.
What sort of plays do you expect to be inside a book with this cover?
Thanks for your help.
-th-
Do not use Google. Do not sleep on it. Do not read the other comments before commenting yourself.
Now:
Look at these two book-cover images. (There are two because the second image will probably replace the one in the current cover.)
Imagine you're walking through the bookstore or browsing an online bookstore.
What sort of plays do you expect to be inside a book with this cover?
Thanks for your help.
-th-
2010-06-06
Embodied svithe
.
Today we spoke of Ruth who used her womanly wiles to do something good.
See? Sexuality ain't evil.
Today we spoke of Ruth who used her womanly wiles to do something good.
See? Sexuality ain't evil.
2010-06-04
2010-06-03
Heart, might, mind and soul (a midweek makeup svithe)
.
I've been getting to bed at 2am more nights than not the last two weeks which has made me cranky and scattered and so, while I have thought about what I will be teaching in elders quorum this Sunday, I have not connected the dots. And I would love to get your input on this because odds are my cognitive capacities will not be restored by Sunday.
When Lady Steed and I lived in Provo, I remember one meeting at which spoke a member of the stake presidency. As he began to segue from talking about his former mustache to his topic, it quickly became clear that it was time for a discussion on porn, much like that my ward had with the bishop last week. But he surprised me. Most of the counseling issues in our stake, most!, were because newly married men were neglecting their wives in favor of video games. You heard me right. Video games were winning the race against nubile young wives.
That's dot one.
Dot two is a terrific article I just read about Brigham Young's take on novels (hint: he hated them).
Dot three is something that sounds very similar, but this time it's our own Elder Bednar tchtching my Twitter habit
Then, just last night as I was brushing my teeth, I read a great article on the world's cognitive surplus. People have donated 100,000,000 hours of time to Wikipedia. Isn't that incredible? And, flipside, Americans watch 2,000,000,000 hours of tv every year. Isn't that incredible. Cognitive surplus. What are we doing with the talents with which the Lord hath given us amble time to magnify?
Which leads to another apostle, Elder Ballard this time, and his take on the digital world.
These are our texts for elders quorum. And, I submit, the issues raised here are of significant importance to everyone --- to both our success as human beings, and our eventual salvation (particularly if we're interested in trading up from salvation to the salvation/exaltation package deal).
Please. Help me connect the dots.
previous svithe
I've been getting to bed at 2am more nights than not the last two weeks which has made me cranky and scattered and so, while I have thought about what I will be teaching in elders quorum this Sunday, I have not connected the dots. And I would love to get your input on this because odds are my cognitive capacities will not be restored by Sunday.
When Lady Steed and I lived in Provo, I remember one meeting at which spoke a member of the stake presidency. As he began to segue from talking about his former mustache to his topic, it quickly became clear that it was time for a discussion on porn, much like that my ward had with the bishop last week. But he surprised me. Most of the counseling issues in our stake, most!, were because newly married men were neglecting their wives in favor of video games. You heard me right. Video games were winning the race against nubile young wives.
That's dot one.
Dot two is a terrific article I just read about Brigham Young's take on novels (hint: he hated them).
Dot three is something that sounds very similar, but this time it's our own Elder Bednar tchtching my Twitter habit
Then, just last night as I was brushing my teeth, I read a great article on the world's cognitive surplus. People have donated 100,000,000 hours of time to Wikipedia. Isn't that incredible? And, flipside, Americans watch 2,000,000,000 hours of tv every year. Isn't that incredible. Cognitive surplus. What are we doing with the talents with which the Lord hath given us amble time to magnify?
Which leads to another apostle, Elder Ballard this time, and his take on the digital world.
These are our texts for elders quorum. And, I submit, the issues raised here are of significant importance to everyone --- to both our success as human beings, and our eventual salvation (particularly if we're interested in trading up from salvation to the salvation/exaltation package deal).
Please. Help me connect the dots.
previous svithe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)