2026-09-30

September, here and gone, but seen

.

Teaching a film class means more films from school showing up on my list. And sometimes they inspire additional watches. I've been thinking a lot about an alternate poster for The Long Goodbye and realizing Altman was the M*A*S*H guy when he made it and they sold it like it was M*A*S*H. But is it like M*A*S*H? I'm...not so sure. And I finally saw one of the most terrifying movies I knew of back in my childhood. So how scary was it?

Anyway, those are possible reasons to read on. That, a coyote, and Scooby-Doo.

Onward!

.

ELSEWHERE
our bluray
Dekalog: One (1989)

Starts cute, ends sad.

I've been wanting to watch these movies for a long, long time.

The first has left me...uncertain what to think next. I can't decide if my reaction is evidence of its greatness or of it's onetenthness.

This is the only one on the Film & Philosophy curriculum, but now that I have them on bluray, naturally I gotta get through'm all.

Wish me luck!


HOME
our dvd
Key Largo (1948)

I have this bad habit of watching movie based on plays and trying to figure them out. I'm guessing there was an intermission between the hotel and the boat? But those were the only two sets? Could be.

It's hard to believe but I'm not certain I've ever seen an Edward G. Robinson movie before, nor a Boge-and-Bacall. I don't want to believe it. But I'm not checking because I don't want to confirm it.

Sadly this viewing included multiple interruptions, one lasting about an hour, right before the final thirteen minutes. That shows no respect to a classic.

Anyway. this is a very Casablancaesque film for Bogie. He plays a character much like Rick only it's postwar now and he's put into a rather different tough situation, but the inner conflicts echo. The film's quite restrained on the romance angle. As is Bacall's blouse. I'm uncertain whether it stays closed due to movie magic or some 40s button technology I'm unfamiliar with.

This is a great use of weather and confined spaces. And I had no idea Robinson does fearful as well as he does frightening.

Classic for a reason. I'll hope to watch it again sooner rather than later.


ELSEWHERE
our bluray
Dekalog: Two (1989)

Oh wow.

Those were incredible closing seconds. I literally spoke out loud what I felt.

And the choices before (the bee, the lie), also incredible.

These movies are gentle and nonabrasive but they are not light.

Terrific ethical dilemma.

But I'm surprised the Ten Commandments are not the Catholic version. This is Poland!

Anyway, be careful how many people you fall in love with, mkay?

[that was not a funny thing to say in this review]


THEATER
Century Cinemark Hilltop 16
Coyote vs. Acme (2026)

So yes, it's great. I laughed a lot. I got choked up. I have a few minor beefs regarding execution, but they are entirely negated by the loving use of old cartoons without debasing the film with cheap fan service. Really, it's a remarkable accomplishment. Praise be it made it to theaters. (The still-present copyright date in the credits is 2023.)

This isn't a fresh insight, but the battle couldn't have happened to a more appropriate movie. This isn't quite a burn-it-all-down anti-corporate rabblerouser, but it is a try-and-fail-again underdog friendbuilder with Bugs as Deep Throat (now we know why he's always headed through Albequeque) and a willingness to let major characters barely appear and a sorta Batman Lego take on the movie's founding relationship.

Anyway, I really liked it. Happy to spend my money on this.


HOME
library dvd
Thunderbolts* (2025)

This is the rare Marvel movie that just improved on a second veiwing. I liked it the first time, but this is the sort of movie that works better when you know what it's up to. Which, again, is not always the case with Marvel movies.

Marvel is running out of imagery. Manhattan getting sucked into some magical (but reversible!) disaster? We just saw that again in the new Spider-Man movie. And while this one got over the default sense of violence-as-a-metaphor-for-every-sort-of-problem-solving, it spent most of the movie in that mode. (But that it does move past it is part of what makes this movie great.

The setups at the end of this movie really emphasize what a disaster Fantastic Four was but also how disjointed the movies progress one to another. Seeing Yelena in the new Spider-Man helped I suppose but still. The quality of this movie and the mess of FF really makes one assume this years Avengers film will be an utter disaster. I honestly don't see how it's possible to do all the things their teasing and all the stuff they've promised into a coherent whole. No wonder they're assigning homework. Avengers: Doomsday is like a test. And if it fails, that's on you, they're saying—not poor test design. As a teacher, let me respectfully suggest otherwise.

But who knows. Maybe it'll be great.

◔̯◔


ELSEWHERE
Hoopla
Stories We Tell (2012)

I remember reading about this documentary what felt like all the time when it came out. Everyone was gaga over it. Just as they had been over her feature directorial debut, Away from Her.

I'm slow getting around to things (he said needlessly) but I'm happy to've finally watched this tale of what truth looks like from within a family, a dozen different perspectives triangulating but never quite nailing down what happened or why or what it meant to people we never fully know.

We watched this as part of my Film & Philosophy class and we started by discussing metahistory (simply, how the ordering of facts turns them from facts into a story) and metafiction (in short, "Duck Amuck").

This is a good movie.

And it seems a lot of the documentaries we call great deal with these meta elements (and rightly so?).


HOME
library dvd
Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017)

Honestly, I never wanted to see this. I hated the '90s film, for one thing. And although people spoke of liking these and although they've all three had hilarious trailers, I figured it would just be a passable entertainment and no more.

But then the daughter watched the first ten minutes with a friend and wanted to finish it so here we are.

And I was right: passable entertainment.

The leads are great, yes, great at being piloted by teenagers. And that's reason enough to blow two hours in Jumanji. But in the end this is pretty disposable stuff.

But.

Now that I've seen one....


HOME
Peacock

The Addams Family (2019)

It's pretty funny with some excellent voice work and no bad voice work. It's going to age . . . less well than some other Addams properties, but it's fun enough.

Which is to say I guess my opinion from last time has held pretty steady.






ELSEWHERE
Kanopy
Memento (2000)

Feels like I've seen this before?

Have I?

It's possible







HOME
library dvd
Return to Oz (1985)

Not only have I never seen this before, but my memories of not having seen it are wrong. It came out in 1985, two years before my family moved to California, which means my memory of seeing a COMING SOON poster in Fresno ain't true. So maybe my not wanting to watch it as a kid because the couple kids I knew who'd seen it said it was scary might not be based on real memories.

The movie was, of course, an enormous flop. I think everyone in America felt the same way about it Siskel and Ebert did. No one could separate it from the almost 50yrold musical. Every difference was an offense.

I'm not sure I knew that anyone had seen it until my mid-twenties when I was working at a job in Sandy, Utah and the high-school kids there had their own little meme about the Wheelers (whom I'd never heard of before).

The only thing that's made me want to watch the film happened almost two decades ago when the excellent musician Eliza Wren crafted a fresh soundscape to accompany the film. (Here's a review of the album. And here are links to my reviews of her band Haun's Mill's albums.) I'm excited to watch it again with her music and probably fall in love with the album and then buy it. I wonder if the actual cd with her Oz illustrations is findable....

Anyway, the thing that made us finally watch it was watching The Wizard of Oz with the 9yrold. Lady Steed then wanted to share Return to Oz with her a movie that, to my amazement, she thinks she's seen more than 1939's. That and a making-of feature that was her introduction to the incredible craft behind movies.

And with the exception of a pretty lame Emerald City, there is a lot of very cool craft in Return to Oz. The gnome king and his minions stand out, but most the effects look terrific. Sort of a Labyrinth / Neverending Story / Quay-or-Czech look to everything. It just delves deeper into the weird and the surreal and the threatening as it goes on. So, yeah, different from 1939. But interesting as its own thing. (The asylum scenes are like Baby's First Scary Movie, teaching kids how to read horror.)

In the end, I'm not sure how "good" it is, but it's interesting and very cool to look at and completely worth the 90 minutes it takes to watch. Here's to watching it again with Eliza Wren in our ears.


ELSEWHERE
Hoopla
Days of Heaven (1978)

Leisurely but not genuinely slow.

Easy to see this is the filmmaker who will someday make Tree of Life.

Exactly as long as class and we have a guestspeaker tomorrow so I won't learn what they think for two whole days! Torture!

I was told as they went out the door that reading Genesis 20 and Exodus 10 was helpful, and was asked a bit about my take on the Brooke Adams character. Hope they remember their thoughts!


ELSEWHERE
Hoopla
The Long Goodbye (1973)

Fun to watch things pop up in this movie. Of course I knew Raymond Chandler and I knew Elliot Gould, but as the opening credits rolled, I was surprised to see Robert Altman direct and, a day after an hour thinking about him, John Williams as well. Williams's score is pretty minimalist, a bit jazzy. Most of the music is dietetic, a wide variety of the theme song in different genres.

Having recently read the novel, I was impressed by the quality of the adaptation. Marlowe's apartment is exactly what it should look like, just moved to the 1970s. The plot is simplified, but it doesn't feel like it. The change to the ending came as a surprise (and a weird one), but, largely, solid adaptation.

Having Arnold Schwarzenegger show up in an uncredited role caught me off guard. This is now my earliest Arnold film, predating Scavenger Hunt by six years.

I read once that you either have a naked neighbor or you are the naked neighbor. Marlowe's definitely the former.


HOME
friend's dvd
The Jane Austen Book Club (2007)

I'm glad that Wikipedia says the movie's a big departure from the novel because I've liked Karen Joy Fowler in the past. That said, Lady Steed just found her notes on having read the book in 2020 which basically said good writing but did not enjoy, disliked all the characters.

The soundtrack is some nice Oughts stuff, but weird choices. The most bizarre was using "Save Me" less than a decade after it got an Oscar nomination. You can't do that!

I know Robin Swicord has written some good movies but woof. This movie is pretty not great. The direction of the actors is mid, the weird injection of golden-hour shots doesn't make sense, the implication of full-on taboo romances (most egregiously high-school teacher/student) are left ungrappled with, the pacing is off, the editing is subpar, it's weirdly pleased with itself for being horny for lesbians.... I mean, hey—making a movie about reading books is a challenge.


ELSEWHERE
Hoopla

Time Travel Is Dangerous (2024)

Basically a science-fiction The Office. Even at a reasonably tight sub-100 minutes, it drags a bit in the third act. The aesthetic is similar to my beloved Molli and Max in the Future.

It has the feel of a lot of friends a-putting on a show, with lots of British That Guys filling up the roster.

I didn't love it but it was a fun way to spend some time multitasking.




HOME
library dvd
Trick or Treat Scooby-Doo! (2022)

This is a pretty consistently hilarious movie. It incorporates post-Ren&Stimpy technique and makes everyone more sexy (especially the villain whose body jiggles Betty Boop could only dream of) and leans on the Velma's-a-lesbian thing, all of which made me skeptical, but it really came together. It's one of the funniest Scooby-Doo things I've seen and is obeys the primary rule of the world. The first Scooby-Doo movie I saw circa 2004 had "real" zombies to which all I can say no no no, not canon, no.

New characters are great, an enormous number of old characters making deserved cameos, hearkening back to earlier shows' opening credits!

The music's great too. You might not guess from his Bandcamp selection, but this guy's Scooby songs sound more like Magnetic Fields and are excellent. A soundtrack worth pulling out at Halloween if it's available. (I think only the score is?)

Anyway, we laughed a lot. That's gotta count for something. (As should falling under 80 minutes.)


ELSEWHERE
YouTube
The Wave (1981)

Never fails to engender excellent conversation. Fitting it into Nietzsche week was kinda great. Especially when the accused the kids of being dumb because they didn't realize the connection to what they were studying while simultaneously missing the connection to what we we studying.

Classic for a reason. Long overdue for a remastering. Surely it's possible? Maybe?


Previous films watched. . . .

2026-09-17

Ladies and gentlemen, friends and strangers, fools and gurus: Honeymoon in Copper

.

As of today, Honeymoon in Copper is completed. That doesn’t mean it will stay complete. After I get feedback and move into working with professionals, any number of changes could be made. But if I were self-publishing, I could go to press today. It’s as good as I can make it without stepping gently into insanity.

I don’t want to say much more about it today, but I will share that the book is broken down into seven days, and here are some stats on that breakdown:

火

Tuesday

3 chapters, 15 pages

水

Wednesday

12 chapters, 62 pages

木

Thursday

5 chapters, 22 pages

金

Friday

11 chapters, 54 pages

土

Saturday

14 chapters, 87 pages

日

Sunday

12 chapters, 48 pages

月

Monday

This one’s . . . a little bit complicated. If we count everything, that’s 39 chapters, 154 pages. But if we stick with Monday proper: 21 chapters, 86 pages. The other stuff can be treated as one, two, three, or four units; if four, that comes to one, one, fifteen, and one chapter(s) per unit.

Guess you’ll just have to read the book.



2026-09-14

"Remember you can trust me / I am not as evil as you think"
(
Snocaps)

.

This is a wild ride of books here. Holy smokes. I'm so eclectic!

I need to feel that way after earlier today..... 

.

047) Resolution by Robert B. Parker, finished August 8

Picked this up from a Little Free Library when I had an hour to kill. Sat near a streetlight under the BART tracks. Logged a hundred pages right there. Every time I sat to read from it, seemed like the pages flew by. Still took a week to notch 321 pages. That's how it goes sometimes.

Parker has a plain style that makes Hemingway look wordy and and McCarthy logorrheic. But it's deep into character. And memorable. Surprised such simplicity works. But work it does.

Probably a lot to learn from reading Parker.

This is the second of four novels in this series about Cole and Hitch. Violent stuff. And thoughtful on questions of morality. But most of what it may be saying goes unsaid.

That's just how they talk 

seven days 

☞

048) American Zion: A New History of Mormonism by Benjamin E. Park, finished August 23

Given that Aaron and I have spent hours (and hours) discussing this book over the last couple years, I don't feel a great need to spill at length here, other than to say that it is excellent. It it tough and steely, honest and true, generous and enfolding. It puts things I know into freshly sketched context and provides new information as well. It's well written and endlessly fascinating. Really, it's everything you might want from a one-volume history on a massive topic.

That topic is the long relationship between the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the United States of America. Which has ranged from fraught to bemused to cozy to dangerous.

As he points out in the final chapter, the current tenions arrive during a unique moment: "The battle they  ['Latter-day Saint authorities'] are waging is not between Mormons and America, as the dividing lines are now within America."

Yeah. So...is that good or bad?


Tomorrow, the two-year anniversary of my beginning to read American Zion, Aaron and I are getting online with Ben to discuss his book and some other shared interests. I'll come back and turn this paragraph linkcolor when that's available online. 

exactly two years to the day 

☞

049) The Candy House by Jennifer Egan, finished September 1

An absolutely brilliant book. My first Egan and I think it's playing similar games to her famousest one? but this fractured series of barely-related stories is absolutely appropriate for the ideas the novel is playing with. Among the stories is perhaps the best second-person story I've read (I can't remember the other couple great ones I know I've read, so who can say for sure).

Up until the last twenty-some pages, I suspected I would be telling you about how great the book was, every element truly excellent, yet not really a very good book because, connected or not, what, really, did these stories have to do with each other? But the last couple stories worked it out. Especially the penultimate one.


I remember reading somewhere, Orson Scott Card saying that he'd rather write novels that short stories because he spends the same amount of creative capital on either and novels pay better so why waste all that effort on a mere story? By that reasoning, this novel required the creative capital of any dozen other novels. Each section is fantastic. It took me awhile to understand/accept that characters that had been so richly drawn might ne'er return. It seemed . . . spendthrift.

The novel takes place in the recent past and the recent future in a world much like but not identical to our own. It's fair to call it science fiction but as it feels more like a world just to the edge of our own that "science fiction" seems like an exaggeration.

But isn't that often the very best science fiction of all?

three weeks more or less 

☞

050) Juliet: The Lives and Afterlives of Shakespeare's First Tragic Heroine by Sophie Duncan, finished September 7

I absolutely tore through the first half of this book (title Searching for Juliet according to the acknowledgments and in Britain—but I like our cover much better*) but slowed way down in the second half where it felt like Duncan was sometimes stretching to fill pages with interesting things she'd found even if there wasn't much to say about them. Occasionally she devolved into overly online liberal cliche in order to glue it all together. That said, I still really dug the book.

The British cover looks like it's meant to attract a YA audience. The American cover is just amazing. I wish you were holding it in your hands.

And this image of Juliet is perfect. She's the right age (not quite fourteen), lovely, thoughtful. I've probably seen it before (I married a huge Waterman fan), but I didn't remember it. It's great.

My other complaint (of this book, remember, that I actually really really like) is that they didn't pony up for a couple twenty-page glossy sections filled with images. Her section on the art of Juliet filled me with a desire to see what the heck she was talking about. And I'd love to see images from various productions she discusses. I care less about images from Verona or tragic couples labeled Romeo and Juliet but you know that other reader want to see that stuff. Not sure how much more expensive that would have made the book but it would (likely) have been worth it.

I want to go back to my first complaint and flesh it out a little. Duncan's at her best when discussing Juliet as an artistic phenomenon. How the story is told and retold in various media (the stage, oils, novels, movies) and her cultural and literary criticism is excellent. She has a harder time when she wants to talk about Juliet's influence on the real world. The stuff about fascists was fascinating but kept losing track of Shakespeare's Juliet. And when we get to topics like real-world people dying under a Juliet label, or diversity in casting, she keeps getting distracted, talking more about contemporary concerns and trying to shove Juliet into the conversation. It's awkward. The information is often interesting but the application to her new arguments read more like a string of tweets fueled by barely contained liberal rage. And hey—I'm pro–liberal rage! I got plenty myself!) but instead of Juliet taking the lead, current worries do, and the book suffers as a result.

But, once again, I loved this book. Through the first half of the book I was constantly interrupting people to tell them cool factoids I was learning. In the second half this rarely happened even though there was still tons of cool stuff. Juliet is the kind of book that makes me wish it was a thing, that writers of nonfiction would create an online repository of all the cool stuff they'd collected. The closest I found for Juliet was its author's Instagram (it's not very close). It's the 2020s! You're allowed a website!

Sigh.

Anyway, if you're at all into this stuff, definitely read Juliet. It's terrific.

(Also, if anyone wants to push back on my first complaint, let me just say you're absolutely correct. It may be a bit sideways, but the naming patters of slaves is important and belongs in the book. I suppose my real issue is rhetoric, not tangents.) 

under two months 

☞

051) Lost Girls by Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie, finished September 12

I kind of want to write a long essay on this book and publish it somewhere but I probably won't because I'm already annoyed with myself for even reading it. But best I can tell, no one's written about Lost Girls with the goal of interrogating its self-serving and redundant and contradictory, built-in, redundant rhetoric. In short . . . it really only works if you ignore what it's saying. But I suppose a work like this that is, ah, meant to be enjoyed an image at a time, can get away with such crap. Especially when it's done by a pair of arteests. And, in this case, if you say the emperor has no clothes on, people might miss the metaphor.

As long as I'm complaining, let me give one to each of the creators. 1) Moore is doing the same thing he's done a dozen times before. 2) Gebbie has a solid sense of anatomy but I'm not sure she's ever seen a human face before. 

nine months 

☞

052) Moby-Dick by Herman Melville, finished September 12

Man, does this novel end powerfully. While at times I'd really had enough of Moby-Dick, here at the last, oh, thirty pages, it is absolute storytelling fireworks and thematic explosions. 100% successful. Amazing.

I suspect every time I read this book (this is only time two) different parts of the story will appeal to me No doubt the beginning will always charm and the ending will always thrill, but what parts from the middle will stick and which will feel disposable?

Part of my wishes Melville had edited a bit more, hadn't felt a need to include everything. But any cut would be a loss to some reader. Some of my favorites this time that may or may have not thrilled me last time include the treatise on white and the Spirit-Spout. The Spirit-Spout got me thinking about how to properly adapt Moby-Dick to film and I decided the best way is twenty or so hourish-long episodes, with the same cast, but delivered by differing behind-camera crews with visions unique to each story. The Spirit-Spout is likely animated. Taika Waititi can have the meeting-Queequeg episode. And so on.

I listened to perhaps as much as a third of this. When I was sick. Driving the length of California alone. I liked the experience well enough.

Of course the real question is will I read Moby-Dick again—truthfully, I do not know.

But even though I'm ambivalent to some measure, it's not a book that will leave me.

I don't think it's unfair to call it a masterpiece. 

five months 

☞☞☞

INTERRUPTION: Usually I forget things I want to stay about books and usually I let it be. But I'm making an exception and am now at 10:02 adding a couple thoughts about these two books finished today.

First, reading the conclusion of Moby-Dick so close upon having read Job twice in two translations is to make the great white whales mythic resemblance to Leviathan, Yamm, the great Canaanite god of the sea plain. And to make Moby Dick all the more frightening.

Job is incredible.

Second, I feel a need to attack Lost Girls a little more directly. The big problem with it is an inherent dishonesty in its project. Explicitly, it argues for pornography as a harmless hustle. Implicitly (and thus more honestly), it argues over and over again that pornography has a grotesque and destructive power. But those regular explicit whitewashes are pointed to as being Clever or Thoughtful and thus sufficient to cover up its deeper gross and sinful truths.

Which is kind of a shame. Because if you set aside the book's fixations on incest and child abuse and the like (which you most certainly should not do) it does have interesting things to say about human physicality and the connections between body and mind, body and spirit. Unfortunately, those things can never be focused on for long as it has to dive back into the merely depraved. Such a waste.

Perhaps the best evidence of what I speak is in Lost Girls' denouement in which it presents, as its moral coup de grace, the stunning and bold claim that nasty German soldiers consumed with a lust to destroy are the bad guys. Astonishing take. A real revelation. They break a mirror and burn a building. That's bad. Sorta puts the raping-children thing in perspective, doesn't it?

Yes. The story thinks that by occasionally (but explicitly!) saying that incest and child abuse are not ideal and should be avoided or by occasionally (but explicitly!) saying that incest and child abuse are fine when mere harmless fantasy, it negates the need for anyone to question its constant and deeply embedded implicit (but, ah, sometimes explicit) arguments to the contrary. But remember! soldiers break mirrors! philistines hate Stravinsky! and so, you know, incest, child abuse...not so bad, right?

Don't forget how on the last page we said war is bad!

☞ ☞☞

053) Apos by Anna M. Wright, finished September 14

First, no question this book is a thing of beauty. Even how it was packed when it arrived in the mail took my breath away. The book itself is printed gorgeously. A terrific use of paper and colors. When you hold it in your hands you'll be surprised you paid so little for it.

The book consists of stories Anna collected over many, many interviews with former missionaries. These former missionaries have a range of attitudes toward and relationships with the Church now that some years have passed. Anna collects their stories and shares them as is, without any judgment. It's almost unsettling how fairly she treats each person without ever inserted her own opinions regarding whether the person is right about this or wrong about that. She just accepts them as they are. In this way, the book is an awesome act of charity. And a bit of a fingerwag at those of us who want to fix people. I don't think of myself that way, but many times when reading this book I wanted to jump in and set folks straight. Even though, time and again, the stories demonstrate that is rarely a helpful coarse of action.

The book also makes me feel old. Stories of pandemic and online missionary work are so alien from my experience thirty years ago. And yet these kids (and they do feel like kids to me, now) are terribly, terribly familiar.

Lately, I've been developing a (hubristic?) desire to serve as a mission president, to serve young missionaries with generosity and kindness, empowering them through patience and listening and demonstrated forgiveness. Don't know why I've been feeling this way (such a call is ludicrously unlikely), but Apos confirmed both the value and difficulty of such service.

Good luck to all the mission leaders out there. Missionaries need your love and your kindness and a certain amount of nobility and goofiness to demonstrate what being a fail-and-try-and-fail-and-try again Saint may be.

a couple months i guess 

☞

 

previous books